Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

they’re just optimizing for the wrong metric. If the metric was “user satisfaction” they could target it day and night and nobody would be complaining.


The reason goodharts law exists is because its hard to measure things like user satisfaction, so we're left with poor proxies like user engagement.


Most metrics would imply prison is great: low bounce rate, average session length of a couple of years, very flat retention curve.


Any metric can be abused if you try to optimize it at all costs. You can easily increase average user satisfaction by reducing the usage by less satisfied users, it doesn't mean you improved things.


The issue is that something like this difficult to operationalize. User Engagement conflated with user satisfaction, with poor results. Maybe you could force your users to fill out Likert scales all the time, I bet they'd love that.


——————————————————————

    Are you satisfied?  
                        
       [yes]  [no]           
——————————————————————


Does high user satisfaction make more money?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: