The 2009 agreement with the EU mentioned in the article seems to be the one about the integration of the Internet Explorer (IE) into MS Windows.[1] But it only applied to IE and the commitment was limited to 5 years.[2]
Or is the article referring to something else?
I see no reason why the EU should object to Microsoft's adoption of eBPF as long as MS Defender simply uses the same API that is available to all competitors.
Or is the article referring to something else?
I see no reason why the EU should object to Microsoft's adoption of eBPF as long as MS Defender simply uses the same API that is available to all competitors.
[1] Here is the original text: https://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/dec_docs/39...
[2] See section 4, paragraph 20.