Recently I was sent a 30 page proposal document filled to the brim with calendar, target and green checkmark emojis. I intentionally delayed my response. The sender got self-conscious, said that they sent an early draft by accident and replied with a concise one page document with bullet points in times new roman 12 font.

> It starts as a murmur in the boardroom, hardens into a cost-optimisation initiative, and eventually mutates into a strategic delusion: “This time, we’ll reduce our need for them.”

For me it’s the flatly self-insistent prose.

We need a rule on this website to ban comments like these. It’s unfalsifiable and therefore worthless.

What happens when we become content for the the push back against AI content content to become mainly AI content?

At this point it's AI discussing with AI about AI. AI is really good at this, it's much easier to keep this discourse going, than to solve deep technical problems with it.

Too many emdashes? That's an ai comment too

Non-sequitur.