Seems like the only option in their situation (and seemingly also mine) is to file a dispute with a CC. Seems like a fairly nuclear option as I simply want this dispute over the share of the cost mediated and resolved, but I guess that's just where I'm left...
I think the thing I'm learning from AirBNB and everyone I've asked is that I should not have bothered to rekey the unit. It seems that if I just had the locksmith cut the locks and walked away with my things at that point, then I'm in the clear. The fact that I decided that I shouldn't leave the unit unsecured is what I'm being punished for seemingly...
I would guess it's closer to a yule-simon distribution, as that is the limiting distribution of a particular form of preferential attachment that has many similarities with how equity is assigned.
You guys mention < 25ms as the performance hit of having you guys in front of the client's application. Is there a more concrete SLA you guys provide? Do you have a sense of what that hit might cost in page rank (there's some theories out there that time to first byte is one of the features that search engines reward)?
Hey 0bfus, we're working on a fancy performance metrics dashboard and status page to answer these questions! Also, we've done extensive research on pageload speed's effect on page rank, and we found that <25ms of incremental latency does not have any impact. We're working on a case study for the latter!
I agree with you that the social structures we've set up have largely forced the hands of the indigenous people who want to keep their lands in their families in perpetuity to sell. How can we actually make sure these lands stay within families forever possible though? To do something like disallowing the sale of these lands outside of their communities doesn't seem particularly ethical either. In this case, that could mean that some of the landowners who might be hard pressed for money might have a pressing need to sell, so how could we forbid that? Just like preserving our diverse cultures, I totally understand the value proposition, but how can you ethically force cultural preservation? Not a perfect analog, but I'm curious how you think a more equitable system might work here.
Isn't that the exact problems that Indian reservations were set up to solve? A kind of community-administered perpetual land grant, basically.
It seems that – some problems within the tribal administrations non-withstanding – the external legal relationships are solved pretty well within that framework.
I was talking about today's reservations as a legal vehicle to allow perpetual group ownership & administration of land, so as to preserve it for a culture. I may have forgotten the part where, once the structure is set up, owners would voluntarily add their property if their shared this objective.
Just accept that the property which you buy is provided with agreements granted to neighbours, and that by buying the property, you inherit the duty to said neighbours.
And then, don't fill a lawsuit to put people out of their homes in order to void these duties.
One thing to note is the reported mindset of the program. It doesn't really talk about their expectations around plausability of this, but rather that they seem to be targeting success through large numbers even at low probabilities. They might not care to anticipate/correct anomalous "course deviations" but rather write those off as a loss completely, hoping that just a few of many initially accelerated succeed.
It would be impossible/unlikely to correct any course deviations anyway. First off, even if the beam is collimated to within a degree or something, a degree at even a million miles is a pretty big spot, and you'd probably not be able to hit any specific unit. Even if you collimated it more finely - good luck hitting the target.
The other problem is that the beam would ideally go straight between earth and Alpha Centauri, and the sail just rides the beam. The Earth does rotate around the sun but the parallax this provides (over 3-6 months) is pretty low relative to the distance travelled by the probes over that time. If you try to do selective course corrections (i.e. bump one side harder than the other) then you're going to need a super fine beam that is going to miss frequently and probably hit the target when you hit.
This is pretty much inherently a shotgun approach. You don't get a mid-course correction on the birdshot that misses its target. Or rather, it's like putting out balloons into the wind and letting them drift.
Can't find it for meat in general, but it seems that rural areas eat significantly more beef than suburban or urban dwellers.
https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/outlooks/37388/29633_ldpm13....