Highly recommend The Man from the Future biography of John von Neumann. We got The Martians for a steal because Europe was too hostile to minorities and we got the Manhattan Project and computers out of the deal. Never gonna have a brain drain arbitrage opportunity like that again.
Whether to help an existing accomplished researcher change address because their home country is not an option, is not similar to the question of whether to educate chinese students who plan to return home.
The only place I've worked that logged out technical details (inside of a <details> element) was also the one that did the best with logging those in Bugsnag and then having engineers triage them and create tickets. I think those things are very connected.
> you can set it up such that each word shows up with a different sentence and image each time you see it.
Does this handle declined languages? I had an idea about 15 years ago to learn Russian by dynamically generating short phrase flashcards with noun-adjective-preposition/role agreement like "with the red house" "to the tall man" "(direct object) new dog" that kind of thing. Is this anything like that? I can't really tell from the demo page
> In 2023, Wizards—which publishes Magic: The Gathering—sent the Pinkerton detective agency to the home of a YouTuber who had acquired 22 boxes of cards
Born too late to get into a gun fight with striking steel workers on behalf of two guys who ended up building libraries, born just in time to chase down ill gotten Magic cards. Goodness.
Not even ill gotten, the guy had legitimately pre-ordered them and was sent them early. They turned up at his door and threatened him and his wife, awful stuff.
I still remember an article posted on HN about a developer/designer at Apple who left an unreleased iPhone prototype at a bar/restaurant. Apple had the entire police force at their fingertips pursuing the person who found it. I don't remember much about the details, but the person who founded may have posted to social media "whoa cool, check this thing out" or something very benign, which brought a major police presence to their house thanks to an employee's mistake. IIRC this wasn't the original iPhone, it was the 3rd or 4th gen thereabouts.
> I don't remember much about the details, but the person who founded may have posted to social media "whoa cool, check this thing out" or something very benign, which brought a major police presence to their house thanks to an employee's mistake.
It was a Gizmodo editor who paid $5,000 to buy the prototype after he basically knew it was stolen property. Apple reported it and the police got a warrant because knowingly buying stolen property for $5,000 is indeed a crime.
Gizmodo also got in contact with Apple and said they'd only return the phone (which they knew was stolen at that point) if Apple agreed to a list of terms. If you withhold someone's stolen property and refuse to give it back until they cave to your demands, the law is going to get involved. Again the warrant/seizure was overkill, but Gizmodo was doing some stupid stuff.
There were a lot of sketchy details about how the original guy got the phone. IIRC he tried to claim it was a mistake and that he tried to return it once he realized he grabbed the wrong phone, but he also made no effort to actually get it back to the bar. The panicked Apple engineer was calling the bar frantically to get it back. If he had made any effort at all to return the phone instead of selling it, it would have gone right back to the engineer.
The Gizmodo reporting also had other controversies. They were milking the situation for all they could, including basically identifying the poor Apple engineer who lost the phone. Really not cool. A lot of people hated Gizmodo for the way they treated the Apple engineer while they were trying to milk that story.
Notice how they open with the Apple engineer's name and personal info. They tell a story that tries to make the person who had the phone sound innocent, but it also involves him going through the Facebook account on the phone and then taking it home instead of giving it to the bar staff.
Then no details about how suddenly Gizmodo came to possess it for $5,000
Thank you for finding this. As I said, I remembered very little from it. Clearly my recollection was lacking.
> they'd only return the phone (which they knew was stolen at that point) if Apple agreed to a list of terms
so it's wrong to give a T&C to a company that gives T&C to its users? You can't see the irony in this? or you are okay with it? Did apple have to wait in line just like everyone else who reports property crime to (presumably) Cupertino PD? I think not.
> so it's wrong to give a T&C to a company that gives T&C to its users? You can't see the irony in this? or you are okay with it?
What? The person had stolen property in their possession. They weren't in a position to be dictating terms of the deal because they legally did not have the right to possess the property, which they were fully aware was not owned by the person they bought it from.
No, it's wrong (and illegal) to hold ransom someone else's stolen property.
The phone belonged to Apple. The phone was stolen (illegal). The stolen phone was then knowingly purchased as stolen property (illegal), and then the reporter demanded payment for the stolen property (once more, illegal).
> You appear to be in Denver, United States. Your internet provider is Netskope Inc. We know this because your IP address — 163.xxx.xxx.32 — was the first thing your device sent us. We know the rest of it. We chose not to display it. Most pages would not have made that choice. We did not ask for your location. Your address arrived before you did.
"We know the rest of it. We chose not to display it. Most pages would not have made that choice" this is written to frighten children maybe? Also that's not my internet provider. Maybe it's my ISPs upstream provider?
there was a prank way back, that used simple html, css and javascript, to instruct the browser to display IP address, public, and local, popup a stream from the webcam, and place them among a crafted document intended to trigger i.e. troll people.
no data was cast to internet, it was all code executed with local user permissions to access the devices devices and logfiles displayed inline as "proof" that you are standing on stage with naught but your drawers.
people were at times moved into a panic and could be manipulated into making contact with malignant entities. there were casualties.
never underestimate the damage that can be caused by manipulating perceptions of the current situation,its not a joke, its handgun serious.
You can do this at Target, Wal-Mart, The Gap (incl. Banana Republic, Old Navy), any department store (Macy's, Bloomingdales, Saks), Paul Stuart, Brooks Brothers. I'm struggling to think of anywhere you cannot do this. Did you drop some qualifier that would restrict "clothing retailer" to a smaller category?
I used to get on a 2/3 with the same driver at the same time a lot and he was REALLY into announcing in great detail how to get to the PATH with his volume absolutely cranked. It got so annoying that I'd actually get off and wait for the next one. Don't need whole minutes of announcements on how you have to go up the stairs and look for signs and yadda yadda. I got podcasts to listen to, man.
reply