Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | AlleyTrotter's commentslogin

you would all be in love with the idea if it was proposed by the obama administration


How did he know they were federal?


The feds have said they're there. Not what they're doing exactly but they haven't been hiding their presence. If you know they aren't local PD because you've been there long enough to know what swat-ass PPD look like the choice is vigilante cosplays or Fed, and Occam says fed.


I think they have patches and stuff on their uniforms, a bit hard to tell in video but looks like it


43 years here


To be fair How much has Google contributed to the Trump campaign? Sick and tired of media blaming everything on DJT.


Probably not as sick and tired as most people are of DJT.


No mention of the actual chemicals being used. Seems they would at least include the MSDS sheets for the process for a well researched article.


The article mentions a number of chemicals and links to a paper describing the emissions at the job sites.


The author describes how it tasted etc. going in. May sound silly, but I have to wonder how it was coming out.


Considering that people eat mushrooms all the time, most likely fine.


In fairness, it's not a crazy question - mushrooms contain a lot of undigestable and fermentable carbs (raffinose, chitin) that can affect ...passage...in some people, and cause flatulence in others. Westerners outside of central Europe tend not to eat meat-replacement-sized portions of mushrooms and are probably more familiar with the digestive dynamics of meat.


Happens every time the accountants and MBA's take over. Experience with three companies bought out by investment funds/accountants. Move on as quickly as possible. Cheers


Eliminate all the bells and whistles and then pay extra to put them back in.


Don't forget it costs extra to have those bells and whistles removed. Looking at a samsung 55" 4k with hdr normal tv at $429 right now, that I can pick up at a local store right now.

Yet they want $599 for a kickstarter tv.


> samsung 55" 4k with hdr normal tv at $429

Link please?


Drive to your local Walmart.


I looked at Walmart's website and didn't see it.


Looked at my local best buy's ads on the site.


I looked at Best Buy's website and didn't see it.


Isn’t it a great idea!

I use my hdmi switch in my AVP, so why would I want a bunch of unused ports?

I use my powered monitors for audio, why would I want crappy built-in speakers?

I absolutely do not want crappy “smart” functions in my screens firmware that already have superior apple-tv counterparts.

Etc.

Smart tv’s are cheaper for a reason. In short - I just want a big monitor. Where can I get a 50”+ monitor for at least a reasonable price?


I have a dozen in my back yard I planted 20 years ago.

Ahead of my time!


Can someone point to a explanation of how to speak/read Rust. exactly how would you say "use std::fs::File" How does one pronounce :: Seems simple enough but things get much more complex by the third or fourth chapter of the Book.


I would just read the words, "use" "standard" "fs" "file" and wouldn't pronounce the "::" at all.


so the " :: ' has no verbal meaning, it's just a way of linking traits, libraries, functions,or crates? Not easy to explain


It's for dereferencing namespaces. "a::b::c" is analogous to a file system path /a/b/c.


I found what I was looking for in the appendix

B-3 Path related syntax """ ::path Path relative to the crate root (i.e., an explicitly absolute """


std pronounced "stud" with a very very short "u".


I never pronounce separators like ::, ., ->... And braces, brackets, parenthesis and angle braces I do not pronounce. Programming languages are made not to sing them, but to write and read. To read silently I mean. While I understand what I'm reading, I do not bother to pronounce it in a way that would be digestible by an accident listener.

If such a strategy stands between you and understanding, I'd suggest you to use silence gaps of different lengths. Like 0.5s for space and 0.2s for ::.


you don't pronounce "->" as returns even in your thoughts?


I used above -> in a C++ sense, but I tried it watching myself with Rust, and seems that I do not pronounce ->. I pronounce just identifiers, keeping track of the context (and therefore the semantics of identifiers) by other means.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: