I find myself struggling with somewhat related situation, everything in my life is going good, happily married and a great job that I love however I find myself wanting to watch the world burn, I get excited about the prospect of war and the collapse of society. I keep it under wraps and don't mention it to anyone but I'm really not sure what's wrong with me.
A friend of mine shared similar story with me. He sold his company, has enough money, travels a lot, married etc
but he secretly hopes for the war, chaos .
I felt that he just wants a reset in life which he can't do himself due to society, family pressure and hopes some external event will do it for him.
I work out in Asia and over here a big reason for ageism in tech is a misunderstanding of development talent, there is a belief that coders are coders and that's all there is to it, young coders tend to be willing to work longer hours and basically work until they burn out so management sees them as the superior option since salaries and benefits are lower.
This is something that doesn't seem real in your 20s, but a realization in your early 30s.
Edit: There is an important balance to keep the enthusiasm of your 20s for a long time, and keeping a little wisdom of recognizing those situations that want to take advantage of a few years of your life in your 30s and being a little more conscious about it.
How does that work exactly? If no one is willing to pay higher salaries then the salaries aren’t higher. Senior people would presumably take junior pay over unemployment.
Junior developer salaries here are low enough that people just change industry. It's also not just about the salary but the way that they work. That all being said there are start ups out here that do look for experienced devs and pay accordingly, my previous comments mostly relate to large local businesses.
Some companies tend to hire only junior devs for junior positions. The argument is that, once hired, senior people complain about being paid lower than a less experienced dev. Some management does not want to deal with that. I know it sounds stupid, but that is what I've heard from some of my seniors.
"Don't push buttons if you don't know what they do!"
That statement makes me a little sad, it's pretty much the exact opposite of the way I was brought up and I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be where I am without the freedom of curiosity I was given at home. The general rule was if it's not going to kill me or maim me then I could have it.
Uh, I'm sad for people who think you have to break things or press random buttons in order to figure out what it does. Like the people in stores who press buttons and then wonder why the police is knocking with a full SWAT team. Documentation exists. The resources exist to inform yourself if you're actually curious. Emphasize the need to satiate that curiosity, but there are ways to do it without being an idiot.
I generally agree with this, which makes the existence of buttons that do kill (you, someone else, or an expensive device) a problem.
I did have to teach my toddler not to press the power button of the PC while I was working. What kind of idiot puts a led in a power button?! Of course children will push that. Clearly PCs need to be put as high up as possible, to keep them out of reach of children.
Interesting, got a couple responses in this vein. I can certainly see how my initial post would give the impression of not allowing exploration. I certainly encourage them to explore the world, learn about things, and figure out what things do. They can of course also ask what things do. I don't think you need to have wide open freedom to try anything to explore though; part of learning to navigate the world is to develop an understanding of what sort of experimentation is safe and prudent, and in what cases learning should be done first. IE: experiment with sandpaper on a fallen branch or scrap lumber, great. Experiment on the kitchen table, not great; potentially expensive.
Likewise, regarding button pushing specifically—say a kid happens to get their hands on a power tool—I don't want them experimenting with it to see how it works; I want them to ask me, and I'll show them how it's used safely. (And if using it safely is within their capabilities, I'll let them try it, or help them to try it.) There are many other similar cases where blindly pushing a button or flicking a switch could be at best inconvenient or expensive, and at worst dangerous. (And of course many more where it would be innocuous.) By teaching kids to differentiate between these, and not to take actions without thinking through the consequences, you can then give them more freedom to explore, confident that they are unlikely to take dangerous or destructive actions out of ignorance.
So yeah, I'm not teaching my kids to never experiment with anything. I'm teaching them to first think about what could happen. In many cases it's obvious, even to a four year old, that experimenting with something couldn't hurt anyone, and is unlikely to damage anything. (And in your example, "if it's not going to kill or maim me, then I could have it," it's implied that someone has already vetted "it" for you, in which case again you know it's safe.) In other cases they might not be sure, in which case it's better to ask (or for older kids, study) than to just blindly try it.
An anti-corruption drive is nearly always just a power shift. Look at the various ones in China, it's never about corruption and more about one branch of the political elite taking out another.
Almost every time we have a BBQ or other outside event someone buzzes a drone overhead and just sits there watching us. Almost every time I go out hiking I hear the high pitched whine of a drone flying around the country park. It seems no matter where I go there is someone flying one. They are a total nuisance, create tons of noise pollution in areas that are usually quite tranquil, invade privacy and just annoy me all around to be honest.
where do you live? I'm in the Bay Area and have never seen any drones flying overhead! I'm myself a drone enthusiast, and I take great care not to make anyone feel uncomfortable (at least not intentionally) when I'm flying a drone
I live in norcal (sacramento) and spend a lot of time outdoors here, in the bay area, and near Tahoe and we see them consistently nearly every time were out, even when we're paddling on the water.
Phoenix area here - drone nuisance an occasional but non-negligible problem here too. Sometimes they're a minor annoyance [e.g., 4th of July fireworks viewing], and sometimes genuinely creepy [hovering over backyards in my neighborhood, sometimes at night]
I observe that the majority of drone owners use them with a mind to avoid making others ill-at-ease, but y'know, tragedy of the commons and all that
This whole index funds outperform actively managed funds claim needs a lot more context. I always see adverts from people like Vanguard claiming such things but they are always just talking about raw returns they never take into account risk adjusted returns or the like. Not all returns are the same, you need to think about the risk taken to get those returns, a market neutral actively managed portfolio may return less than a passive fund but it's volatility will be much lower to.
I guess things have moved on from this Perl-Vista nightmare, I was personally looking forward to having all the coders around me screaming at their desktops in a fit of frustration and rage.
