Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | KONAir's commentslogin

Meh, I can live with it if OS becomes free.


Linux is already free, so what's the problem?


Incompatibility, battery life, impossible number of combinations to support, need to use terminal, etc


> Incompatibility, battery life

Buy a computer with preinstalled Linux. Everything is fine on my Librem 15. Suspend works 100% of the time.

> impossible number of combinations to support

Support Ubuntu/Debian. It will be enough. Or Flatpak.

> need to use terminal

This is an obsolete information from the 90s.


> > need to use terminal

> This is an obsolete information from the 90s.

Except it's not in too many cases. Bluetooth, WiFi, multi-screen setups often devolve into terminal debugging sessions.


Never happened to me. External monitor, WiFi work fine. Bluetooth untested.


This got me thinking that MS might actually be telling the truth here. Maybe they only plan to enable it for pirated copies.


Pirated versions would be the first to rip that out completely.


Windows is already free


If UN or another international body like Interpol suddenly grew the courage to do it planetwide, I'd be the first to volunteer.


You can volunteer installing CCTV in all your rooms, including toilet, and regularly send the footage to the police station. However, let us, normal people, to be excluded from this dystopian madness.


Bench pressing macaques on instagram soon.


spqr I am a 90's spqr child I like spqr texture behind spqr text but spqr spqr is quite spqr spqr


Diablo 1&2 were Blizzard North things who were more or less autonomous though. I feel this needs mentioning.


Diablo 2 came out over 21 years ago; if it were a person, it would be old enough to go to the bar in the US and get wasted.

I don't think it needs mentioning. It is impossibly hard to keep the same culture at a game company two decades later, especially when the company grows so much. It's not like Valve is the same Valve that released Half-Life, or Bungie is the same Bungie that released Oni. None of these companies today could possibly have a similar culture to what their company culture was when those games came out.

Changing company culture, it turns out, is easy. Stupidly easy. I say it's "stupidly" easy because all you need to do is hire new people, and most companies already do that. The hard thing is changing company culture in the right direction.


> I say it's "stupidly" easy because all you need to do is hire new people

Don't forget turnover rates, too! The games industry especially has turnover rates that would be astounding in some other industries. Crunch culture and youth culture (both direct co-factors in the issues Activision are being accused of) leads to a games industry that is perpetually stuck "young". The median age of a developer in games has pretty much always been close to 25. (We're getting very close to the point where the median age of developer at a videogame company is younger than Diablo 2.)

It's easy to believe that videogame companies especially have short memories and cultures that lack maturity when they are perpetually stuck in an elongated sort of adolescence by mostly only retaining developers that can put up with crunch and lack of work/life balance in the name of "passion" (who by nature of those challenges are almost always going to be younger and more naive).


Even if you kept the culture perfectly intact, gaming itself has changed. Players expectations have changed dramatically. You'd need the same culture perfectly adapted to the changing gaming landscape which never happens.


Games have changed vastly more than gamers. Nobody actually wants micro transactions or paid DLC.

My 8 year old nephew spends vastly more time on very old and Indy games not because their “popular” but simply because their more fun.


I don't really think that the culture at the company to be equal to the culture of gaming overall to be honest.

In fact Blizzard and especially Activision aren't really well loved company by gamers. Didn't EA got the title of worst company multiple times? They probably have a decent competitor now.


Which is why there's the biannual Diablo 2 clone that flops, and the "horrible", "failed", Diablo III is on its 24th season and sold like gangbusters on consoles.


Just here to say that I loved Oni very much when I was a kid. So ahead of its time. It lives on as the Office of Naval Intelligence in Halo.


Blizzard North more or less dissolved 18, and officially defuncted 16 years ago.


Why is this being burried? Is there even any doubt about China's edge had been and still is ignoring envorimental sanctions and outright denying workers rights?


Because it’s blatantly false. Just take a look at how many nuclear power plants are being built in China, and compare with eg the US.


-I have next to no clue what I am talking about- Wouldn't a "wheelchair as powerbank" be the best solution to get people as mobile as possible?


It's not bad. Then you just have the issue of the cost of the batteries.

It's possible to have the device be corded and stay within a room or set of rooms.


I meant more like wheel(?) shop to shop, do the shopping on foot so it charges while wheeling.

Is wheeling the verb for it anyway?


Also there is something to go on about passively encouraging remaining oil dependent but opium wars just doesn't compare.


I suppose a spoken line at the begining along the lines of it is not that person, but a generated voice, would be the best solution.


Are there any studies on "I can tell from some of the pixels"? Over the years I keep coming across both people (and myself) on internets being correct on 'shopped photos while masses belivied in. Is this just down to familiarity with software and a health bit of skepticism?


I think it's the healthy skepticism that's more important than being able to detect some minute detail in an edit. For a while photos were considered strong proof, not so much today.

There has been research on detecting photo manipulation and there's plenty of things people can watch out for if they're trying to "prove" an image was altered, but a lot of edits I see are so bad/obvious that the people making them aren't really trying to "fool" anyone with them. They just think it makes the photo look better. They'll do things like jack up color saturation to impossible/unnatural levels, or remove every pore from their skin, etc.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: