Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Qworg's commentslogin

If you enjoy the podcast or the newsletters, I do recommend the Discord (https://discord.gg/oddlots) - the folks there are generally very smart and it is a great place to discuss everything from the economy to climate to transportation to defense.

Is there a way to use Discord without using the awful childish interface?


Very smart people on discord sounds like an oxymoron: why would anyone very smart contribute to the siloization of knowledge and support grow a corporate entity possessing highly questionable incentives? Discord is not a great place to discuss anything of substance.

If that's not clear to some now, it will be once monetization kicks in and the inevitable blowup and loss of accumulated knowledge follows.


You're using Discord to describe the same thing that could easily be applied to any social network.

Yes, it's borne of teenagers and gaming, but for all it's dark corners it's just the modern IRC. There are good servers, there are bad servers, there are servers full of idiots and there are servers full of very smart people.

(and we're way past monetisation kicking in, the first paid options launched almost 10 years ago)


I suppose smart people can’t optimize for pure discussion? One of the most popular and easy to use messaging platforms seems like a reasonable choice.

> why would anyone very smart contribute to the siloization of knowledge and support grow a corporate entity possessing highly questionable incentives

Some smart people aren't as concerned with knowledge siloization as other smart people. I'm sure if you went to their Discord and suggested an alternative platform with the same popularity and feature set they'd at least hear you out.


Mentioned, but there's usually a discussion.

Does this include "mentioned" as in "Don't read this book, it's full of errors"?

This. Same question for all those "I analyzed HN comments that mentioned books and you can browse them here" posts.

Your responsibility as a developer in this new world is design and validation.

A poor foundation is a design problem. Throw it away and start again.


We’ve always been responsible for design and validation. Nothing has changed there.

It’s funny how the vibe coding story insists we shouldn’t look at the code details but when it’s pointed out the bots can’t deal with a “messy” (but validated) foundation, the story changes that we have to refactor that.


But how will new developers learn to design and validate in the future?

Both TOWs and M47 Dragons are "remote controlled".


Given what you need, you should look at a Telo.

https://www.telotrucks.com/

Not launched yet though.


All of these are "not launched yet."

I thought the Slate looked interesting. Then the price started creeping up.

I'll just buy a Ford Ranger or Maverick instead.


Your team's fixed preferences get stored into your .agents.md file so you don't type it over and over.

If you change your preferences, the team refactors.


While the methodology wasn't published, Microsoft did something similar for Flight Simulator.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/flight-box...


If you want to dig more, I suspect Microsoft got a lot (if not all) of it from blackshark.ai . They're one of the companies whose logo shows up during game start.

I knew their name because, when I worked for an Airbus subsidiary, we talked with them about a solution to generate 3D environments for any/every airport.

They had some cool stuff but also some wonky stuff at the time (like highway overpasses actually being rendered as walls across the highway).


blackshark.ai was used for generating building models with textured facades from footprints. Their thing for generating airports was actually not used in MSFS. The photogrammetry from satellite photos in MSFS 2024 was done by Maxar Technologies.


Ah, neat. How do you know this?

And also, was it any different for MSFS 2020?


My side-project is working on addons, so I spend a lot of time with Flight Simulator. 2020 didn't have the photogrammetry from satellite photos, only from aerial photos in major cities. The blackshark buildings are used wherever they don't have any photogrammetry available.


Neat (again :) ).


FIS is just waiting for them to pay $250k/enabled API call to make it happen...


Come now - you really believe that Elon saw DOGE as a good faith effort to cut costs in the government?

For someone with such a vaunted intelligence, he was either dumb or complicit. "Working things out from first principles" would have had him leave after the very first step.


To make it more concrete - here's an example in Chinese: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grass_Mud_Horse


> 2009, renowned artist Ai Weiwei published an image of himself nude with only a 'Caonima' hiding his genitals, with a caption "草泥马挡中央" (cǎonímǎ dǎng zhōngyāng; 'a Grass Mud Horse covering the center'. One interpretation of the caption is: "fuck your mother, Communist Party Central Committee"). Political observers speculated that the photo may have contributed to Ai's arrest in 2011 by angering Chinese Communist Party hardliners.

How did I never hear about this detail??


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: