Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | SubiculumCode's commentslogin

Every article like this there is someone that points this out. Not hard to do but sure is reliable.

As an aside: I personally have no use for unicode for bash commands, and the potential for sneaky maliciousness worries me. Does anyone know of a way to automatically strip (e.g. with tr) all unicode away when pasting into a terminal?

That's a fairly common human error as well, btw. Source attribution failures.

Yes. There is a ton of Russian propaganda against the Catholic church claiming the current and last popes to be "anti-popes" and spawns of Satan, and all that, and it is exactly this progression Catholic Church-->Russian Orthodox Church which is under Putin's thumb.

:) Coffee is good

Yes, I can see this as non releasable for national security reasons in the China geopolitical competition. Securing our software against threats while having immense infiltration ability against enemy cyber security targets....not to mention, the ability to implant new, but even more subtle vulnerabilities into open software not generally detectable by current AI to provide covert action.

Anthropic and OpenAI have very different cultures and ethos. Point to other times where anthropic has gone the way of cheap marketing tricks. Now look at openAI. Not even close.

Anthropic has done plenty of cheap marketing tricks as of late, see their recent non-functional C compiler that relied on a harness using gcc's entire test suite

It is functional. You can try it yourself or find third-party tests of it, even. Why do you think that it's a "cheap marketing trick" to test it on the GCC test suites?

Not surprising given that they dont even know why claude-code works as before or doesnt work [1] ie, there is no known theory of operation. Explains why they are afraid of it.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660925


I think Boris will come and say there is no issue with claude code.

It is easier to destroy than it is to protect or fix, as a general rule of the universe. I would not feel so confident about the speed of the testing loop keeping things in check.

It is not scaremongering.

Equating the ability to make weapons as something to be scared about it scaremongering.

That can simultaneously be true, but the best of bad options (if excluding destroying the model altogether). These models may prove quite dangerous. That they did this instead of selling their services to every company at a huge premium says a lot about Antheopic's culture.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: