Rough translation of video transcript (YT transcript translated by deepl.com):
Lenses.
This year's theme is now holograms
and it's pretty funny that this is
is called a holocam, and it's pretty funny.
If you look at it right now, if you look at the spring right here.
you can see a little bit of blue
you can see a little bit of blue, which is actually
what is it?
it's actually acting as a camera, so
Now, if you listen to the explanation
what we call holography.
is that it's now reflecting light, so we can gather that light
and you can collect that light and act like a camera
like a camera, so for example, you can now
what?
the meat.
it can recognize the blue color
and only recognize the blue part.
Jace's
holocam. It's quite
interesting.
> "Since the industrial revolution in the 18th century, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere (an important greenhouse gas) has risen significantly above the level it would be naturally. It now stands at over 400 parts per million (ppm) in the atmosphere. Evidence from ice cores (see Lesson four) tells us that the normal level for CO2 in the atmosphere during ‘interglacial’ times (such as the Holocene in which we now live) is 270 to 290 ppm, and that at no time over the last 800,000 (the time covered by ice cores) has the CO2 level been as high as it is now. (CO2 is thought to be at its highest level for three to five million years.)"
You misunderstand me - I am not talking about man made climate change. I am saying that having data that shows current temperatures are highest ever in 1000 years is not surprising, given that temperatures have been rising for last several thousand years.
If one had a time machine and went back 1000 years, took temperatures and compared them to those from previous thousand years, one would not be surprised to see that on average they were higher.
No one is misunderstanding you, you are just wrong.
Even if you were right and we were in a "warming" phase, the velocity of the change should be on a geological scale; that is, very very very tiny. We are seeing rates of warming orders of magnitudes higher, which cannot possibly be anything but man made.
At no point have I mentioned scale of change or rate of change. That is irrelevant to the point I am making: that during a warming phase, average temperatures will be the highest they have ever been at the end of the time period under consideration. So a result confirming that is hardly news.
4000 years ago there were still mammoths and far greater glaciation than now, so clearly climate has been warming over the last few thousand years.
Sure. But if someone is saying "the house is on fire" and you reply, "Ah, Yes, clearly we should expect it to be getting warmer, after all it's springtime now", it's not much of addition to the conversation.
