>at least one of the FAANGs already had auto-complete so good it could do most of what LLMs can practically do

Could you clarify what you're referring to? I'm interested.

It would be interesting to have a graph showing AI adoption in coding against the number of weekly outages across different companies. I am sure they are quite correlated.

> It would be interesting to have a graph showing AI adoption in coding against the number of weekly outages across different companies. I am sure they are quite correlated.

Probably a stronger correlation to the fact that vibe-coding has resulted in millions of new repos being created, with automatic CIs being triggered by agents continuously sending PRs for those projects.

I bet there's other factors that are correlated as well!

Do you know the difference between a curve and its derivative?

Or the opposite might happen:

https://notbyai.fyi/

What makes you so sure of it? LLMs are just the novelty of the moment, no empirical evidence yet indicates that it's the direction the industry is going to take, it could just be just another fad like VR or web3.

Two days before 9/11 happens, talk about creepy numerology.

Because that wasn't happening in the first place?

What does that matter? The original question was:

>I sympathize but very rich people owning the media never ends well

How does the history of the ultra-wealthy controlling the narrative in media for their own gain change that statement?

The comparable cases are Bezos & Zuck, the parallel is Berlusconi. Yes it's all scary

Fewer than var or let?

What? I said I prefer let.

I thought the title was about which Git server platform is going to be the successor to GitHub once we've had enough of Microsoft's bs.

I've replaced the submitted title ("GitHub Successors") with a phrase from the page that says what it's about.

Thought so too, then looked at url (docs.github.com) and thought "really?" :)