Did the same. air air is cheap and works like a charm. this 40k for heatpump is for the most luxury version every salesmen trys to sell

air conditioning is also a heat pump. they cost way less then the air/water heatpumps and are easy and cheap to install. Since two years I heat with air conditioning and its super effective and cheap.

edit// Hot water is generated by electric solar panels. 1200w are sufficent to have enough hot water for two persons

french does "," and "." like the british and germans the rest is space befor space after

the main theory is that with bad results you have to search more and get more engaged in ads so more revenue for google. Its enshitification

i dont want to be the guy but the law is not about police having acces to private messages. As far as I understood they want to scan content for csam material by hashing. and if positive police geta involved. Or am I wrong? Maybe I misunderstood something.

but this is still somehow breaking encryption.

for example ones porn history could be used against that person if he she wants to go for public office. So there is a chilling effect for watching porn. Politics are dirty allready but the way down is deep.

Maybe they should "own it" instead? I don't think these days legal porn use would be all that harmful. but i don't disagree with your point.

But look at it this way, surveillance already exists, all major governments are hacking into people's phone and spying on them, and forcing telco's to do dragnet surveillance. chat control is about doing it at a greater scale and formalizing it for normal law enforcement use instead of things like counter-terrorism.

yes and I understand the benefit but i doubt the real world consequenzes. It would only filter the criminals who are good at opsec and those who arent. imho elevating a more proffesional type of criminals. Honestly most major crimes are money related. Get rid of papermoney and make digital payments traceable for law enforcement. I know there is something like gold bitcoin etc but at the end knowing how money moves is more power then knowing what people are writing

what people dont get about mass surveilance is that big systeme are easy corrupted. for example if I want privat data about peoplw from police or assurance or state office there is a way to get them with money and connections.

So if mass surveilance is implemented it would be missused for personal benefit of whoever has the money and the possibility

good one :) I read the irony ;)

Not all will ...