FYI there's an LF AI Landscape which basically duplicates a bit of this work

https://landscape.lfai.foundation

Would love to collaborate with the author of this as I help run CNCF/LF landscape infrastructure.

At a quick glance, they seem significantly different. https://ai-infra.fun/ contains things like OpenAI & Anthropic under the LLM section.

I don't see that on https://landscape.lfai.foundation/. Also, I don't see a space for Code or IDE tooling the Linux Foundation page. ai-infra.fun contains TabNine and Tabby.

Would things like TabNine and Tabby make sense on the Linux Foundation one? Would love to collaborate on this!

It could! I've been pushing them to expand the LFAI landscape to be broader, I'd reach out to https://www.linkedin.com/in/ibrahimhaddad/ who owns the LFAI landscape.

Vitess is an open source and openly governed CNCF project

https://landscape.cncf.io/?selected=vitess

Any thoughts of contributing this upstream directly or to CNCF?

We would be interested in hosting and supporting this type of work.

You can reach out to me via cra@linuxfoundation.org if you want to chat

Sure, would love to! I'll ping you.

There's 100+ certified kubernetes distros/products :)

https://www.cncf.io/certification/software-conformance/

A mature open source project may be governed under an open source foundation which usually gives it a charter https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/main/charter.md#3-va...

... and/or set of values: https://kubernetes.io/community/values/

There's also a lot of open source guides here https://todogroup.org/resources/guides/ that may help you if you're looking at building mature open source projects.

Also check out https://o3d.foundation and Godot as options... open source gaming engines should be at the heart of modern game development imho, just like Linux is the heart of many infrastructure things we do

FYI 99% of CNCF projects use DCO, only a handful still use CLA but we give projects a CHOICE in the matter. I prefer DCO personally because it's a lower barrier to entry for contributors (e.g., not formal legal agreement to sign and be reviewed by lawyers)

https://chooseafoundation.com exists but not fully up to date.

As someone who has been involved in many open source foundations over the years, they all have their pros/cons. If you are looking for the most customized approach, the Linux Foundation (LF) is probably the most customizable as they have build hundreds of entities that many people may not think of being part of the LF... CNCF... GraphQL Foundation... R Consortium... OpenJS Foundation... Overture Maps Foundation... LF is really "foundation as a service" and they are best at ecosystem building from my biased perspective.

There are other foundations out there with their own advantages... ASF is very lightweight and pretty much accepts anything open source as long as you adhere to their fairly simple rules... EF is great if you have a need for a European base etc

Awesome to see how enthusiastic this community is! We at the LF are excited to work with the wider community to bring them under neutral governance like our many other foundations/projects. On the CNCF side, we welcome an application through the official processes when they are a bit further along with establishing their initial governance here: https://github.com/cncf/sandbox

agreed... I know a lot more folks that SSRIs have messed up in a variety ways than psychedelics... we should offer folks MORE options when fighting depression/anxiety and encourage experimentation