“It brings up some interesting points for this article...”

Why are you acting like a LLM that had its own earlier statements run off the end of the context window and can’t remember you yourself said them?

Sounds a lot like the old guarantee paid SSL certificate providers used to offer; pretty words, but meaningless in practice. (IIRC, no one ever got a payout from any of them.)

"We assume scraping and parsing liabilities for both domestic and foreign companies unless your usage is otherwise illegal" seems like a big loophole in it.

This also means you may have to pay for it out of pocket, rather than having it covered by insurance.

> The chatbots swayed opinions by citing facts and evidence, but they were not always accurate—in fact, the researchers found, the most persuasive models said the most untrue things.

Yikes.

What counts as a tie?

The current President is married to a foreign citizen. Does that count?

They aren't actually skeptical, though.

You've upgraded a visa denial to a Federal crime. Congratulations!

Sovcits similarly use lots of complicated legal terms.

They just don't use them correctly and/or appropriately.

Remember that the Jan 6 rioters were chanting "hang Mike Pence" on that day.

They're Trump supporters, not Republican supporters.