https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B004LSBYR0 I have used this for a few years as my everything backpack, originally bought it to cycle in to work because I showered at the gym (so was carrying everything I needed for the morning in there including work clothes, toiletries etc.)

- Super cheap

- Hard wearing (just about breaking after 3.5 years)

- Very large capacity (just about get away with it as a cabin bag)

- Nice little laptop sized pocket in the middle

I have the same exact bag, had it for about 3 years. Still great. Got inspired by Mr. Robot and had to get one.

I think that this is supposed to be similar to the classic tamagotchi's off of the 90's. There were no status bars (like a real pet) and figuring it out was part of the charm . I do think that if the pet is really hungry/thirsty/tired there should be an a different animation, like pointing to mouth for hunger.

I agree animations and aesthetic are awesome (much better than the original LCD pixel Tamagotchi's).

There is a tiny red deficit "income" at the top just to the left of the middle of about £55.8bn

Thanks - that's going on my bookmarked links.

I agree that this is preventable but you can't assume that everyone knows these things, especially when there is an article like this that doesn't contain any help or advice! Of all people the BBC should be using this opportunity to help people.

IIRC the Scientology E-Meter is quite similar to this, I can't quite remember if one spawned the other.

The concept of having a machine that can measure X attribute from humans have probably been a thing for long before both of those. Probably the earliest example of that (I can remember from the top of my head) is finding out if someone is a witch by throwing them into water with a stone attached to them. It's just with more technology, the "tests" become more advanced/elaborate.

Indeed. See also: phrenology

How do they know/enforce that? (Put a different way, if I were a journalist what would stop me entering the same way as Joe Average)

Usually when entering a country one is asked the purpose of one's visit. Saying you are there for vacation when really you are there working could be an issue.

The electric city

Did you listen to it?

You can remember the order of an entire pack of cards?!? Are you a wizard

Can someone explain why the inurl:server is used? Wouldn't this also work without that (and reveal more results where the keyfile has been renamed)

I used inurl:server to restrict the results to mainly just server.key files so revealing the private keys of HTTPS websites.

Of course you can remove it. Just means more results to wade through.

More results does not necessarily mean better results. They probably got more specific to remove references to documentation and such.

Another interesting thing about google is that this search may return results that are not found without the inurl:server

At a guess, this is to filter out SSH keys, which have an identical private key format, and we well know already how many of those get committed to GitHub. I think this is to highlight where the server's HTTPS key is visible.

I'm curious also as i'm getting 5x the amount of results excluding the inurl name filter