Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | colecut's commentslogin

I do think I answered his general question, which seemed centered around his bitcoin skepticism.

The more detailed answer on how this works can be found by going to the site and clicking "How It Works"

1 Someone Emails You 2 The Gate Catches It 3 Sender Sees the Payment Page - The sender clicks the payment link in the reply. They see exactly what's being held and what it costs: 4 Pay with Lightning — 15 seconds 5 Email Delivered


You created an account to say that.

Inefficient human response.


LLM or not, it provided more value than this thought/question directly from your brain


i assure you my comment went through at least three layers of indirection


phew


What are you skeptical about?

You don't need to buy into the "Bitcoin will replace the U.S. dollar" narrative to buy $5 worth of bitcoin to send a few hundreds or thousands of emails..

No one goes to an arcade wanting to play a game and says "I don't know about these tokens, though..."

You buy bitcoin somewhere (if you can't figure this out yourself you arent trying)

And send it to whatever address this app provides to you..


AI gave you the option of making it happen without learning anything.

It also gives you an avenue to accelerate your learning if that is your goal.


and it will be folks using AI taking over for at least a while...

Some people try, most people don't.

AI makes doing almost anything easier for the people that do..

Despite the prophesied near-term obliteration of white collar work, I've never felt luckier to work in software.


Actually, no she didn't, but a lot of people are saying she did.


Which is a weird thing to make up given that there’s already so many horrible bytes to choose from that aren’t fabricated.


Snopes confirms this: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bondi-epstein-files-system...

But everyone knows Snopes is leftist propaganda, so it's probably false. /s


It is amazing that this has to be confirmed on a website...

Wouldn't there be a clip of her saying it?

No one has even bothered to spend the 25 cents on an AI generated one as far as I've seen.


> It is amazing that this has to be confirmed on a website...

I think it has a lot of memetic power because it’s plausible given the other things she’s said, like trying to deflect to economic “success” by pointing out the DOW ~is~ was over 50,000.

It also doesn’t need to be an attributed quote in order to reflect the countering sentiment: “Yes, prosecute those in the Epstein files no matter the geopolitical and economic cost.”

It also has a certain whiney, servile tone to it that makes it just annoying enough to trigger the leftist “ick” instinct.

Idk, I hope the 50,000 dol- meme picks up and people stop spreading this fabricated quote.


Paywall


My 15 year old son has been building his own video games with Unreal Engine for a few years..

I was recently looking for mentors to work with him and advance his skills, targeting college aged kids / young 20s..

It was surprising to me how many people I came across in this field at this young age that are trying to focus on the "higher level" game planning aspects and not so much on the lower level implementation specifics.


I highly recommend the Handmade Hero series to folks in his situation. Casey has put up an absurd amount of material for everyone for free.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnuhp3Xd9PYTt6svyQPyR...

https://guide.handmadehero.org/hmcon/

https://guide.handmadehero.org/

https://handmade.network/forums


I have seen dozens of people/videos talking about buying Mac minis for clawdbot.

I don't understand why, but I've seen it enough to start questioning myself...


unreasonably judgmental rant against your solution

Vague/useless contribution of an alternative

here's a penny, bot


It's OK to criticize without offering solutions


There’s no criticism there. Calling people racists and bots is not criticism, it’s just name calling. There is nothing critical about it.


It was an observation, and a criticism. It was massively reported that Shitter has a huge problem with bots, and was very publicly known when company valuations were happening. And, since the handover to Musk, there has been a documented shift to extreme-right-wing content on the site.

I'm not going to beat around the bush. You know as well as I do that X has become the de-facto social media network for extreme-right demographics and the overall quality of content has objectively diminished as a result.


Yes, the quality has gone down, but not much quality can be had in 140 characters in the first place - so it is impressive that it was managed in the first place.

> their users are either racists, bots, or simply garbage people

It is a bit intolerant to go and blanket label a large group of people like that. Sure there are extreme views, but that is what is bound to happen when you have a large amount of users on a platform. So it is on reddit, bluesky, YouTube and what-not. But there are also a lot of milder people.


There was nothing constructive about his criticism of the platform related to web dev in any way.

I know a lot about his politics now though.


> I know a lot about his politics now though.

I guarantee you do not.


This!, its amazing how some people want to drag you into their world and have a huge discussion when all you want to do is point out some part of their idea your dont like.


Yep It's some kind of logical fallacy where they try to discredit what you're saying by asserting that you must have some kind of solution in order to justify identifying a problem. It feels as if they try to 'prove' that they are smarter than you are, because you clearly don't have solutions where they clearly do.

It's a weak form of deflection.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: