Gulid.ai is the control plane for agents. We're building a new way of orchestrating and sharing agents that mimics some of the best parts of Github, with the centralized control and credential management that enterprise shops need.
From our about us: We are builders at heart—founders, SREs, open-source stewards, architects of large systems, and people who love creating things from scratch. We believe AI should amplify the creativity of everyone who builds software, not just speed up tasks. If you’re technical, curious, customer-driven, and want to shape how the next generation of software is created, we’d be thrilled to work with you.
We have multiple open roles, including AI Engineer, Forward Deployed Engineer, and Software Engineers.
Agreed, people confuse the (totally expected) bumps and bruises of early adoption with somehow equating to "this technology is useless."
The Wright Brothers couldn't cross the Atlantic in their first flier and plenty of subsequent designs crashed and burned (literally). But now air travel is commonplace. Same will happen with AI, we just have to get past these early pains.
> The same thing every DIY and shade tree mechanic uses to read codes and run service procedures.
Now you have me wondering if this is their real target, to go after people who are defeating CRM on their vehicles so they can repair them themselves or in their small mom-and-pop garage of choice. But right to repair is popular, so they have to claim it's for something else.
I would suggest the one exception to this would be courses explicitly designed to teach how to use AI, and how not to. But in that case, it's less "use AI to cheat on this course" and "AI is the tool this course is about."
Then it becomes, teach what? "To use AI", yes, and, then, to do what? Use it how? To make some software? Why? You are already taking software engineering classes to learn to make software. To write something? Why? You are already taking classes that ask you write things yourself. An AI class, to me at least, is akin to taking a class about how to pay someone to write your essay for you.
And if we are talking about the various AI strategies people have where they have LLMs talking to LLMs to come up with whatever gooblyguck, are the poor souls who've been asked to come up with the AI class for the department going to know any of these strategies themselves? Are these strategies even going to be sustainable going forward after VC is no longer subsidizing tokens?
Regardless of VC subsidies, the cost of compute always trends down over time. Whether you like it or not, LLMs will be a pervasive part of everyone's life forever (or at least until a better replacement comes along).
Cost of compute trending down is usually lost as the resulting software bloat that fills the empty space like a gas. We already see this with LLMs. Models get bigger and bigger in an arms race.
I don't think that is a safe assumption to make. Moore's law is not playing out any longer as it used to. Jensen Huang already called it dead 4 years ago.
Gulid.ai is the control plane for agents. We're building a new way of orchestrating and sharing agents that mimics some of the best parts of Github, with the centralized control and credential management that enterprise shops need.
From our about us: We are builders at heart—founders, SREs, open-source stewards, architects of large systems, and people who love creating things from scratch. We believe AI should amplify the creativity of everyone who builds software, not just speed up tasks. If you’re technical, curious, customer-driven, and want to shape how the next generation of software is created, we’d be thrilled to work with you.
We have multiple open roles, including AI Engineer, Forward Deployed Engineer, and Software Engineers.
https://www.guild.ai/careers
reply