Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | czscout's commentslogin

Would you give it a rest? It's being used here as a colloquial term that's distinct from an actual medical diagnosis.

The colloquial use of the word “autism” carries with it a specific connotation and mind image. That primarily negative stereotype is being reinforced by the joke by way of it being delivered as a medical diagnosis (“the results are back”).

Your parent comment is arguing against perpetuating the wrong negative connotations and lack of understanding of autism.

Not to say the original author was doing it maliciously, I don’t think they were.


And it's time that colloquial term is put to a rest. We've left other terms behind us which used to be thrown around mindlessly but were (are) actually hurtful, we will manage with that term too.

Yeah, I wasted probably 40 hours of my life on Canonical's interview process and never even got to talk to a person. They wanted to know my high school GPA and ACT score.

They wanted to know my high school grades and ACT, and they also made me write a nine page essay about skills that have been impactful to me.

Then they made me take some weird IQ test thing, and then they wanted me to take another one. I was genuinely starting to get kind of worried that they were going to make me talk about my astrology sign, so I eventually just emailed them saying that this is all stupid and I don't want to continue.


I've heard enough about Canonical's absurd requirement to write essays that I just ignore their adverts nowadays.

Which is a shame, as a former Debian developer I feel I could work on interesting things with them.


Wow, classic Capricorn, no wonder they turned you down. /s

In this scenario, how might one become a senior without first being a junior? Seniors just pop into existence?

The business leaders do not care about this yet. I think a lot of people think we already have more Seniors than we will need in the next 5-10 years.

Also - the definition of Senior will change, and a lot of current Seniors will not transition, while plenty of Juniors that put in a lot of time using code agents will transition.


>while plenty of Juniors that put in a lot of time using code agents will transition.

But will they? I'm not at all convinced that babysitting an AI churning out volumes of code you don't understand will help you acquire the knowledge to understand and debug it.


Some will, some will not; hiring interviews and promotion committees will take care of the rest.

The bet from various industry leaders appears to be that the current generation of engineers will be the last who will ever need to think about complex systems and engineering, as the AI will just get good enough to do all of that by the time they retire.

I think it’s deeper than that because it’s affected more industries than software and already started pre AI.

American corporate culture has decided that training costs are someone else’s problem. Since every corporation acts this way it means all training costs have been pushed onto the labor market. Combine that with the past few decades of “oops, looks like you picked the wrong career that took years of learning and/or 10 to 100s of thousands of dollars to acquire but we’ve obsoleted that field” and new entrants into the labor market are just choosing not to join.

Take trucking for example. For the past decade I’ve heard logistics companies bemoan the lack of CDL holders, while simultaneously gleefully talk about how the moment self driving is figured out they are going to replace all of them.

We’re going to be outpaced by countries like China at some point because we’re doing the industrial equivalent of eating our seed corn and there is seemingly no will to slow that trend down, much less reverse it.


> we’re doing the industrial equivalent of eating our seed corn and there is seemingly no will to slow that trend down, much less reverse it.

I know I'm probably coming across as a lunatic lately on HN but I really do think we're on the path towards violence thanks to AI

You just cannot destroy this many people's livelihoods without backlash. It's leading nowhere good

But a handful of people are getting stupidly rich/richer so they'll never stop


I don't think you're a lunatic.

If you look at the luddite rebellion they weren't actually against industrial technology like looms. They were against being told they weren't needed anymore and thrown to the wolves because of the machines.

The rich have forgotten they are made of meat and/or are planning on returning to feudalism ala Yarvin, Thiel, Musk, and co's politics.


> The rich have forgotten they are made of meat and/or are planning on returning to feudalism ala Yarvin, Thiel, Musk, and co's politics.

What are you realistically willing to do? How far can you go?


Get back to me when my fridge and bank account are finally empty.

Also you’ll never get an honest answer on a public forum because moderators remove them


> They were against being told they weren't needed anymore and thrown to the wolves because of the machines.

I guess that makes me a modern luddite then

A software engineer luddite

A techno-luddite if you will

Maybe I have a new username


Apprenticeship. You will have to prove to the company that working at a minimal wage is still beneficial. Or we can take it even further, you will have to pay the company for getting the necessary experience. Maybe you sign a 5 year contract with a big cancellation fee. It is not unheard of. I remember some of the navy schools having something like this. You study for 5 years for free (bed and food are paid by the school) and then you have to work for at least 5 years for the navy or pay a very big fine if you refuse to do so.

Location: Bozeman, MT

Remote: Interested but not required

Willing to relocate: Yes, particularly to NYC

Technologies: Python, AWS, C/C++, Linux, IoT, FastAPI

Résumé/CV: https://www.hohosunbear.com/cv/

Email: cole@hohosunbear.com

Hi, I'm Cole Brooks. I'm a fullstack engineer with additional experience in embedded systems and IoT. I have experience building robust, FDA and HIPAA compliant software. I'm a fast, enthusiastic learner, and a passionate problems solver. I'm particularly interested in positions in NYC, and would love to have a conversation about joining your team!


Sheldon's website is such an awesome relic of the internet we all miss. It still has a ton of relevant information if you ever find yourself dealing with obscure wheel sizes or something like that. Love it. RIP.


Yeah, I was really expecting them to just continue the partnership that Apple announced when the iPhone 16/iOS 18 came out, but I suppose it's been pretty much radio silence on both fronts since then. Although the established stability and good enough-ness that Google offers with Gemini are probably more than enough reason for Apple to pivot to them as a model supplier instead.


And a no soliciting sign is no more cosmically binding than robots.txt. It's a request, not an enforceable command.


Tell me you work in an ethically bankrupt industry without telling me you work in an ethically bankrupt industry.


It really does seem as though Broadcom is entirely shifting VMware's focus the the top 5 or 10 percent of customers who probably make up the vast majority of the actual profits. The message they've delivered time and time again to businesses outside that group is pretty simple "go away" price.


Problem is when the expunged 90% creates a market that gets filled with a cheaper product that also can do what the top 10% needs.

Then VMware dies because it cannot decrease prices anymore due to lack of volume.


It seems like it, making VMware Fusion and Workstation free seems to fit with that strategy.

A bit of nostalgia: my first VMware product was VMware Express for Linux. It was a stripped down version of Workstation (probably 2.0?) that could only run Windows 95/98:

https://web.archive.org/web/20010124081300/http://www.vmware...

Does anyone remember Win4Lin 9x (based on SCO Merge)?


I believe they are referring to the fact that the article states that every crew member survived. As in, none of them didn't make it.


The human crew members made it.


+1, there are definitely some sad parts to this story.


He did one better - Shackleton returned to England with more crewmembers than he departed with.


If you don't count the dogs.



Personally, I don't agree with this proposal. While yes, I agree, that bare excepts are often a source of bugs, I don't think it should be the language's responsibility to nanny the programmer on such things. To me, this seems to only reduce the functionality of the language. If explicit exception handling is necessary, let the programmer make that decision.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: