> What percentage of your inputs are invalid numbers and why ?
This is a wrong question to ask in this context. The right question to ask is when actually exceptional flow becomes a performance bottleneck. Because, obviously, in a desktop or even in a server app validating single user input even 99% of wrong inputs won’t cause any trouble. It may become a problem with bulk processing, but then, and I have to repeat myself here, it is no longer a number parsing problem, it’s a problem of not understanding what your input is.
Actually, I like Maven. It's perfect for code that is broken into medium-sized projects, which makes it great for service-oriented architectures (would have said microservices here instead, but think we're learning that breaking our services too finely down is generally not a good idea).
Yeah, it seems like Maven is designed to build just one project with relatively little build-code (although, figuring out versioning of the libs used in your build can get tricky, but guessing this is how it is in most languages). It's still one of my favorites build tools for many situations.
LOL I wish. LLMs massacre gradle code all the time. Once you're past boilerplate generation and doing anything remotely unusual they can't stop hallucinating broken shit that they insist works.
I've been using maven for 20+ years, gradle for 10? ant for 5 before that. sbt for 15. I've written custom plugins for all of them. I know them quite well, unfortunately.
I use LLMs to maintain them now. I keep the build files simple. It was an inconvenience before, but a trifle now.
This is why I use java for long running processes, if i care about a small binary that launches fast, i just use something slower at runtime but faster at startup like python.
I think they were buying carbon offsets at some point and trying to validate that the countries and organizations that were selling the carbon offset were not cutting down those trees, effectively profiting twice.
Presumably the smart ones just sell their promise-not-to-cut-down-my-forest multiple times. Laundered through completely trustworthy NGOs, so nothing can actually be audited properly.
you would think so! as a "vaccine skeptic", i think this kind of research is important and patients should be able to decide w/ their doctor which to pursue based on their individual condition. perhaps this tradeoff will be worth it in higher risk individuals.
reply