That is very interesting. Do you happen to know if Rockstar Games was onboard with this? Or would this be considered fair use, given the lack of competitive overlap between the supermarket and video game industries?
I do all world updates overnight for this very reason. But on my R5 3600, the longest emerge is, by far, qtwebengine, which takes just under 1.5 hours. Plus, Gentoo provides -bin versions of many packages notorious for protracted build times, such as Rust, Chromium, Firefox, etc...
-bin seems like a strange thing when you are doing Gentoo, which is all about compile locally. Gentoo has always been about choice and -bin is a choice. However you lose USE flag choice decision with a -bin.
The possible combinations that Gentoo allows looks to me like a sort of Linux immune system in action. Quite a few "unpopular" flags will get used (lol USEd) somewhere by someone that will be more motivated on average to log a bug somewhere.
Gentoo also got the console shell look (colours, fonts etc) right way before any other distro. It's copied widely.
Sure, binary packages don't reduce choice though since they are available in addition to the normal packages (except for stuff that is not open source at all).
Wanting to have control over config via use flags for your system doesn't mean that there aren't packages were you don't really need that. Like if you only use Libre Office a couple times per year on your aging laptop, do you really care enough about the exact USE config to justify compiling it yourself? Even more so if you need it on short notice. Or if you only use Chromium/whatever to check that your website works with that browser but don't actually use it yourself, why bother compiling it.
IIRC there used to be a Gentoo fork (forgot the name) that extended this concept to all packages, so if you used default USE flags you did not need to compile things yourself.
I would imagine that automation plays a role. And maybe car manufacturers can exercise more control over assembly lines, and don't have to worry about unforeseen environmental factors. Of course, that is just a guess, I don't know enough about construction or car manufacturing to really say.
I have always used Pass [1], and while it is certainly less convenient, it doesn't really take too much extra effort to self host your passwords in a PGP encrypted git repo. Self hosting has drawbacks of its own, of course.
That this was the work of an otherwise uninvolved opportunist is always a possibility (it came to mind while considering that the document was from Feb 10, unmarked, and had been stapled), but I am almost certain it was not done for financial gain. Maybe I am naive, but I do not think news organizations pay their confidential sources very much for their trouble. So it just seems unlikely in this case.
I use qutebrowser[0] which is built on qtwebengine, which is based on Chromium but comes with the caveat that it will likely be blacklisted by Google since it does not follow upstream's release schedule. But it is trivial to get around this by setting the user agent to something not blacklisted.
