Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fdrs's commentslogin

I did the same. I have a debian stable. Everything else besides build-essential, firefox and gnome is either docker, homebrew or flatpak


no lead R4L left because of the current situation. Marcan was the lead of Asahi Linux, not R4L. Wedson (which was one of the leads of R4L) left some time ago, before all of this, and his problem was not with Hellwig (or, at least it was not the one that brought the last drop).

edit: whitespace


Hellwig had a spat with asahi lina back then as well.


Rust + nom makes it easier


I tried using tusk to follow the blogs using my mastodon.social account... I can see the profiles, but I can't see any post.


This is how Mastodon works, unfortunately -- it doesn't pull in old posts. But now that you're following the blogs, you'll start seeing any new posts that come in.


writefreely doesn't provide a public feed, it only one-off sends to servers that subscribe to it


crostini does not need developer mode to run. what happens is that it is still in chrome os developer channel, which means is still in beta and can have bugs, but is something diferent then developer mode, just to make things clear.


Oh great. Thanks for clearing that up. I'll still wait until it's on the release channel but it's good to know I don't have to turn on developer mode to use it.


yes, they are


He will not even get near the jail. Google has money. Here, in Brazil, thats enough for solving any problem with the justice. Justice system here is a joke that just punishes poor people. There are _several_ cases of celebrities killing people while driving drunk at high speed, and _NONE_ of them ever got to prision. Everything is just a veeeery sad joke....


"There are _several_ cases of celebrities killing people while driving drunk at high speed, and _NONE_ of them ever got to prision."

I don't know about Brazil, but in Argentina that would be the correct ruling according to the law. They probably didn't think they could actually kill someone. In the worst case, they thought it was possible, but too improvable. Plus they were drunk. So you may not like they laws, but these rulings alone do not necessarily imply corruption.


> They probably didn't think they could actually kill someone.

In Brazil that would be true in the case of a regular car accident, it would be regarded as having no intent to kill.

If you are drunk however, brazilian law understands that you had intention to kill, because you know well enough that drinking will impair your driving and most likely kill someone.

However, an officer's statement is not enough to prove that you are drunk, you have to agree to take the test, and if you don't, than you can just throw money at the case up to the point where the final ruling is so late to the fact that the penalty has expired.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: