Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fourmajor's commentslogin

No, you wouldn't.


I was being facetious, of course I wouldn’t (though I rock the YMCA) :)


She got 20 months for blocking the motorway! https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgxqwwev50ko Seems excessive.


You can get longer than that for tweeting the wrong thing in the UK.


Command+Ctrl+Q will also lock the screen.


I've been using Feedly on the free plan for years and I love it. What do you want that the free plan does not do?


The body panels are evidently actually bulletproof https://electrek.co/2023/10/20/tesla-shot-tommy-gun-cybertru...


"The stunt by Tesla by shooting a .45 caliber bullet at the cyberpunk doesn’t prove it’s bullet proof.

A 45 is a low-velocity round with a very large blunt nose.

If they shot it up with an ak47 round or a 5.56 out of a AR15, they would have made Swiss cheese out of that door panel.

There are many high-velocity pistol rounds that would do this also. One is a 5.7mm or a .22 magnum."

from that same article


I didn't see any reference in the parent comment about donating to EA the institution or "gurus" rather than directly to charitable causes.


GP was defending EA even though TFA clearly explains how stolen money by SBF was used to buy a $16 mansion in the UK by the EA movement, all the while knowing SBF was living a lavish lifestyle but presenting him as an altruistic genius.

In other words: GP's comment defends EA without taking into account the facts shown in TFA.


GP here.

Article is BS, that money wasn't stolen. The decision making behind the purchase was transparant. Furthering the cause of EA itself was a goal of the specific fund from which they drew that money [1]. It gives them a place to have big nice conferences, which drives donations which will well exceed $16M.

Anyway, I didn't donate to that fund. I donated to the Global Dev fund [2]. If you donated to fund [1], then you knew your money would be spent on stuff like conferences.

[1] https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/ea-community

[2] https://funds.effectivealtruism.org/funds/global-development


I would love to sort by date added, as a way to keep tabs on how things are improving over time.


I have both of my credit cards and my bank set up to email me with every single transaction. So even if I forget to cancel a subscription it's only going to ding me once to make me remember to cancel.


I disagree that stars should be evenly distributed between 1 to 5 stars. I think it's quite possible that most books that people choose to read end up being a 3 (good with some flaws) or 4 (good but not all-time great). It's kind of like the same thing with pizza. I'd give most pizza a 3 or 4. Very few 1s and 5s to be sure. 1 doesn't have to mean bottom 20% of pizzas. It can mean "awful, couldn't finish," where very few pizzas would fall into that category. 5 doesn't need to mean "best 20% of pizzas," it can mean "telling strangers about it the next day," again where very few pizzas would fall into that category.


I had a debate on the Criticker site about this topic since they try hard to turn your raw ratings into a normalized span. The fact is that because of ratings sites, I'm very rarely watching 1-star movies. That's good! So the low end was dominated by a 2.5/3 type ratings, which per my scale meant "just OK," but they were mapping it to "bad," somehow inferring that my rating range is 3-5.


“Normal distribution” doesn’t mean evenly distributed. Most being in the middle is a normal distribution.


I don't doubt that some "real people who do real work" will be turned off by the appearance of the Cybertruck. However I am confident it will have the best specs for the price of any EV truck and so some "real people who do real work" will buy the Cybertruck as the best choice.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: