I've been storing TOTP codes in on my Yubikeys for many years now, it works pretty decently. They have an app for it (https://www.yubico.com/products/yubico-authenticator) which has gotten better over the years. For redundancy I've stored keys on two devices.
I've got an r5c running friendlywrt 23 and am looking to migrate it onto an r6c that I've got (the addition of an nvme drive makes it a lot more powerful for running containers). I'm glad I waited for this release.
As it happens this has been in the news quite a bit, and we've been told that the Finnish trunk lines are built for this [1]. Finland isn't split up into multiple electricity price areas unlike its neighbors.
Are you sure? I have a VAG group car with the same sync button and it simply ensures that the set temperature is the same on both sides of the car. As this car already looks like it has automatic AC that shouldn’t require additional hardware, unless this is some fancier ”sync” than mine..
That's how it is in older Audis. You don't order a feature - you get a plug for a button. If you retrofit it later, they add a button. What they did here is absolutely 100% tacky, shame on them. All of it, but especially the wording of the message.
I sure hope they learn from this and never do it again. Saying as a die-hard Audi fan.
Why tacky? I get it, from their point of view, it saves costs of manufacturing and logistics ("Customer wants car with button that does feature X, dealer only has cars without this button, now customer has to wait for a different car to be shipped or the button to be shipped and installed by the dealer, which will cost a few hours of the service department's time").
Of course they should've had a "Customer experience" department who would've told them how this improvement of their workflow would annoy the customer and look bad for them.
I encountered this when canceling my Lightroom CC subscription. Changed me from ”potential future customer” to ”never buying anything from Adobe again” pretty quickly.
One detail I stumbled upon the other day is that interfaces can use the `this` keyword to refer to the type implementing the interface. This isn't supported for types afaik.
