Was also looking to see if that was possible recently. Wonder if either party would consider supporting that officially?

Someone posted a script for installing omarchy on cachy, but it didn't look like it had received updates recently and I reported an issue. Not sure it's being maintained at all unfortunately

> In 4.0, with the complexity savings we achieved by moving to fetch(), we can now comfortably fit a morphInner and morphOuter swap into core

It seems odd to me to treat these as different properties on their own? might as well keep it as an extension if it is not going to be more deeply integrated and let htmx 4.0 be smaller? Possible I may not be understanding the use case though

> it’s surprisingly effective, if mentally exhausting!

this sadly seems to sum up most of this new wave of work. hopefully we can find a better workflow that still feels as good as coding used to

I would be curious to see if some qualcomm/snapdragon mini PCs could embrace the tinker-ability and power consumption approach and add some nice competition there

Fun idea. What are common use cases for this? The Chrome Web Store would be nice to make it easier to try out.

I use it for very random things while I browse the web. One example was ordering train tickets in France, I asked it to summarize all the options I was presented with.