I was actually going to disagree on first glance but I absolutely agree with this.

Transmission has no business edge, you will gain the best economies of scale by having the city (or larger regional) manage it.

Free-market works on the generation side because as prices change, producers can decide to build out more capacity or innovate to gain an edge. I don’t think a single monopoly construct, like the PG&Es of the world, have incentive to innovate and properly serve the market.

I still think decoupling generation from transmission is part of the problem and I don’t know if I love the construct of a single legislated monopoly.

In this specific case, Liberty and constituents should have come up with a plan on the first contract term for generation. Maybe it meant spinning up their own generation plant within CA or NV.

It’s not a popular idea here but I still think energy markets can help solve this problem. If you have multiple producers and a market rate for electricity you can more quickly incentivize new generation and innovation compared to the single operator monopolies that exist.

That’s how I read it too. Liberty alongside constituents had 20 years to figure it out.

Data centers are just the new shock titles that people eat up.

This is an interesting problem. I have been wanting to dig deeper on some of the complaints around water and power. This one is unique though.

Doesn’t read much like a problem so much with data center growth as it does with Liberty mismanaging their business/assets. For almost 20 years liberty acted as nothing more than a transmission operator with very weak agreements on power generation. They should have been figuring out this problem long ago.

I would think that a lot of rural electrical cooperatives are "nothing more than a transmission operator" i.e. they own/manage/maintain the lines from their providers out to their customers, but don't have the capital or expertise to run generating plants.

“nothing more than a transmission operator with very weak agreements on power generation” don’t take the quote out of context now.

I would bet most coops have fairly concrete contracts on generation. This one is unique because they were using usage from a grid they have no standing in. Weak agreement, folks should have been figuring it out 20 years ago.

Humans are bad at solving problems before they need to be solved.

As someone who has been wearing earplugs for decades for motorcycles, firearms and other loud events, this information at face value is a bit off.

Foam by far has the most effective NRR. Silicone and wax are fine but will not provide as effective of NRR. That said, if it’s for sleeping silicone and wax are probably fine. I would argue that foam is not scratchy at all but I usually buy more expensive brands like Mack’s and it’s good to try out different sizes.

I don’t think this it’s worth being reported for asking for a source on this kind of claim. I would argue of a middle ground though. I think field tests origins came from a good intent of trying to distinguish intoxicated drivers but has morphed over the years and used to give reason to search your belongings. I think the original post is wrong, the intent is not to arrest people but they are commonly used as a means to get cause to search your vehicle.

And I don’t have a source, so it’s anecdotal but one of those things where you read enough of these cases and even see how cops are trained that the intent for most stops unrelated to genuine traffic violations is to get cause to search the vehicle.

I think back to some of those corridors within the United States where law enforcement abuse cash forfeiture laws to take peoples money.

The nuance here too is that just because someone has concern about materials being discoverable does not mean the company is doing something illegal. Corporate law as it pertains to legislation (US in this perspective) is a dance between company and current administration. When it comes to antitrust and other related legislation the equilibrium is shades of gray that changes between both administration changes but sometimes from the same administration. Companies look to optimize their outcomes and the government is optimizing not so much for legality but what the current administration sets as the main concern.

Hyperliquid while big in crypto is still small compared to mainstream financial markets.

I don’t think you have made a case for anything yet.

So when the iphone came out and no-one was using it, it wasn't useful? I cannot conceive a reality where I perceived the current state of things as the only things that could ever exist. I do not believe anyone could have that amount of self-regard, it is impossible.

HL has been tested up to $8bn/day in volume. The gap in resources is several orders of magnitude so if big exchanges were doing 1000x more volume it wouldn't matter because HL is literally running with a handful of engineers vs thousands. In reality, HL is doing 25-40% of CME, for example.

No idea what you’re trying to prove. You have said a lot of negative things and your examples is hyperliquid which is processing small volume.

Agree. The slogan or header should what is in the first sentence. “Version Control for AI agent activity”

The word is treasure hunt. Stores like Costco or TJ Maxx (there are others) use what they call the treasure hunt. They design the whole experience around you walking around hunting for that new piece of treasure that you have to buy.