at the end of the article they made a clear distinction between flawed and hallucinated cititations. I feels its hard to argue that through a mistake a hallucinated citation emerge:
>
Real Citation
Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. Deep learning. nature, 521:436-444, 2015.
Flawed Citation
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and Geoff Hinton. Deep leaning. nature, 521(7553):436-444, 2015.
Hallucinated Citation
Samuel LeCun Jackson. Deep learning. Science & Nature: 23-45, 2021.
When my parent speak about AI, they call it Copilot. Mircosoft has a big Advantage that they can integrate AI in many daily used products, where it is not competing with their core product like Google
good catch, actually increased to 1mb, I struggled at the beginning with the 20mb limit for inline data. But will look into the resized versions because i realized sometime is missed great images because of the limit. Thanks for the feedback!
its crazy to me, how the author describes that they broke in his flat and stole an old laptop of a relative, like its an absolutly normal thing. He seems like he just accept its and moves on.
That is definitely not their point. Their point is, quite simply, “don’t punish us, bro”. They don’t give a rat’s ass about the law in general or what it means for other people, they just want to make sure they specifically can do what they please without repercussion.
I think they try to argue around the diffrence of sharing activly (=illegal) and downloading (=valid) with this argument it does not matter if you download one book or 1 million books
On the off chance the defense succeeds I'm proven right, if the defense fails, I'm still proven right as the fine will only be a minor set back for Meta.
> Real Citation Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. Deep learning. nature, 521:436-444, 2015.
Flawed Citation
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and Geoff Hinton. Deep leaning. nature, 521(7553):436-444, 2015.
Hallucinated Citation
Samuel LeCun Jackson. Deep learning. Science & Nature: 23-45, 2021.