Talk to a VC as well. Or more than one, and ideally ones that are in the medical device space and have done similar deals with others from your university. If they are interested then they can apply pressure on the university too, to get to a solution that works for everyone.
The New Zealand Active Investor Plus resident program requires $5m NZD, which is under $3m USD, but that would take everything. There is another program mooted where you buy a business for less than that.
NZ’s Active Investor Plus program is more like EB-5 than this. AIP requires that migrants invest their funds, not donate them.
The Growth category requires fewer residency days and a NZ$5m (~US$3m) investment in “growth” companies or funds, including VC funds and companies that VC funds invest with.
The Balanced category requires double the investment and has a wider range of asset classes, but also a longer duration and higher number of days of residency required.
If you copy the generated url and put it into the entry field (and repeat) then you end up at a bitcoin site. As Bubblerings has pointed out that has malware.
> If you copy the generated url and put it into the entry field (and repeat) then you end up at a bitcoin site.
Uh, what? I just tried it a few times, and it seems to just follow the redirect each time, always ending up back at the original target URL I entered. How many times did you have to "repeat" to make that happen?
> As Bubblerings has pointed out that has malware.
No, that's not what BubbleRings said. BubbleRings said one site on VirusTotal reported it was malware. That sounds like a false positive because the URL is fishy, which is the entire point of the joke here.
I clicked and there is absolutely is content that is not acceptable, to me, visible on the front page.
Everyone has a different opinions of what’s acceptable, which is why we have ratings systems so society can draw a line.
If a platform doesn’t curate then governments or the legal system, or lobbyists targeting payment providers will step in.
I see a lot of violent stuff, which I think many parents wouldn't find acceptable. I also see a little bit of weeb shit, which again may be unacceptable. I don't see anything which is obviously pornographic; the closest I see to that is an ad for Witcher 3, which I know to have nudity which could reasonably be called pornographic, however nothing in the ad hints at this. It is clearly a violent game though.
And again, studies have shown violence in video games does not increase violence in kids as they grow, in fact it tends to be an outlet, so it should be up to parents to control what they see as acceptable for the kid they are raising.
This push for governments to restrict EVERYONE's kids because a group of parents dislike something is insane, if you don't want your kid to play/watch something, the enforce some damn rules on your own kid.
reply