I'm pretty sure Excel can do all of this. I think if all of the data has already been ported to Excel, it would be much easier to figure out how to make Excel do what you want than to port the data to something else and learning something else.
In this example, you could filter the data by name, sort the results by the date, and highlight all duplicate addresses using conditional formatting.
If you really don't want to use Excel, you could load the csv in almost any programming language; read in the records, find the duplicates and spit the resulting records back out into whatever format you want.
It's obviously not as full featured as Rosetta Stone, nor does it come with courses, nor does it use voice recognition - but it does rely on basically the same research into memory and I've had a lot more success using Anki than Rosetta Stone.
I've used Toggl (http://www.toggl.com/) and Harvest (http://www.getharvest.com/). I like them both, though they are not local apps. But, you can use them on any of the multiple machines you use.
I agree that it seems valid. I also think that Google would most definitely use that data if they had it. Google used to show live twitter results in their SERPs; but stopped when Twitter took that data away if I remember correctly.
Sorry guys. The Apple Game Server can only stream single binary RAM-only games. Disk-based games can be streamed to disk at http://asciiexpress.net/diskserver. I added Oregon Trail.
I work with ellyagg and I can confirm that he did in fact gain 25 lbs in a month using GOMAD, CrossFit and some additional strength work at the gym.
In the same time, I lost about 23 lbs with a diet of few carbs and no processed food, and doing the same exercise routine. I've kept it off even after going back to more normal diet. But, I plan on doing it again since I've still got some weight to lose.
Google has told me (and other users of the now deprecated AJAX Search API) to switch to their paid Custom Search API.
The new API is missing some features that were in the old API, which is unfortunate. And, also unfortunate, the most accurate Google results (Local, Web, Image, etc.) come from scraping in ways like this article describes. Hopefully, Google will address these issues in its Custom Search API. If they don't many people will still continue to scrape.
But the Google Custom Search API is a different thing. It's a search based on a set of sites. What's important is to have an API to search for the "whole" indexed Internet, and Google is the most advanced search engine in town. If you play with more complex queries you quickly note the difference between Google and Bing, Yahoo or Blekko.
Yes, which is what we thought too. But, you can setup a "custom search engine" with some default site (we used www.google.com), then change the settings to that it uses the entire web, and remove the site that you originally put in.
The Bing and Yahoo APIs are definitely a lot better, IMO. But, as long as Google wants me to use their Custom Search API, then that's what I'll use.
I'm using Mouseflow for one of my sites at the moment, and I've also used CrazyEgg in the past. They're both great services, but I'm looking for some custom javascript to integrate into my own app.
