> the ability to "hotswap" models with different utility instead of restarting the server

The article mentions llama-swap does this

Because it's illegal and that matters to some people

Why did they even mention it was vibe-coded? Would it not be a lot harder for someone to prove that fact if you just didn't tell them?

yes https://copyrightalliance.org/current-ai-copyright-cases-par...

"Phones were a mistake. Every one I have owned has been recalled for being a fire hazard."

Li-ion fires do not require external oxygen, the cathode decomposes to release its own oxygen gas during thermal runaway... fire extinguishers will not stop it.

> why limit them at all

Because it's a numbers game... the original order itself even acknowledges that the problem is not unique to power banks, but that what makes power banks unique is the amount of increased risk they pose compared to other devices, due to a higher ubiquity of them in general, and of low-quality unsafe ones.

If laptops were catching fire with the same frequency, they'd ban those too, but they're not. They technically can be made just as unsafe as power banks, but they usually aren't, and this directive is based on the frequency of occurrence of a particular type of device, not a general "what if" strategy.

Banning all electronic devices would be extremely unpopular and possibly tank their sales. They're trying to balance safety with convenience at a level that is acceptable to most people.

There are non-rechargeable power banks too though.

> I can

You can guess, but there is no single objective test that is 100% accurate.

> No idea why

Probably because business users on macs are a rounding error, no offense.