Porsche has been trying to transition to mid-engined sports cars ever since they started for better handling... the first 356 prototype was even mid-engined. But consumers keep wanting to buy rear-engined 911s so they keep selling them.
Porsche's factory race cars have been mostly mid-engined all along, and the 914, Boxster, Cayman, and 918 Spyder are mass produced mid-engined models.
Mid-engined Porsches IMO are ideally suited for EV conversion because they have no back seat, but instead have room for a battery right in the middle of the car, where the impact on handling is reduced.
The Cayman and Boxster are amazing to drive but even less practical than a 911. It's pretty tricky how Porsche purposefully underpowers them compared to the 911 so they keep selling their big ticket items. Also those two little jump seats make it a more or less usable family car for people with small kids.
A two seater is more practical for me with one kid… I can take the carpool lane with just the two of us! I take my son to school everyday in a Boxster… the dealer said I’m the first person in an decade to get the airbag reprogrammed for a front child seat.
Porsche had a hilarious ad campaign for the Boxster supposedly marketing it towards families with kids… pointing out that you would have to leave the kids at home.
I actually disagree that the Boxster/Cayman are underpowered just to sell 911s, I think Porsche engineers know what they are doing there. They are lighter than an 911, and have less traction with the weight further forward. They can’t really make use of as much power as a 911, and don’t need as much. Maybe with a limited slip and real race tires, but otherwise the Boxster already has as much power as it can actually transfer to the ground. It looks underpowered on paper, but I don’t think that opinion would persist past driving one hard on a winding road… they have a ton more power than other similar light roadsters like an mr2, miata, or Lotus elise.
That's a good point, they may not be able to effectively use it. But: the point that they are trying really hard not to cannibalize 911 sales has been made many times before and has more than a grain of truth in it.
Haha... He is used to it, and is mostly jealous that other cars have roofs for shade and warmth (I leave the top down year round)
It's true though that they could easily upstage the 911 with something more like a street legal version of their mid engine race cars. They arguably did this with the Carrera GT and later 918, but they didn't sell well at over $800k.
Too bad the plate cost data wasn't presented. Was wondering which was the most expensive.
In Oregon the cost varies pretty wildly, and some don't have a renewal surcharge.
Generally, if the plate is for a special-interest group, part of the registration fee is a "donation" to that group.
In Kentucky, part of the registration/renewal fee is an "ad valorum" tax (based on the assessed value of the vehicle). The state constitution requires taxes to be based on assessed value. This value drops every year until it hits the minimum assessable value of $200 for (land) vehicles and $100 for motor boats.
I forget it now, but I believe we pay an extra flat $30/yr for our "NC Aquariums" plate. The price is the same regardless of which optional design you get and the fee goes to the cause on the plate.
Back in the day I came across a PC port of Mortal Kombat II. The box had a label specifically stating that it would not run on the AMD CPUs of its day...
It's funny how these days were forcing you to make choices, and people had to make it appealing. Now it's anything anywhere anytime and it feels like a swamp.
Honestly even their mid grade and above power tools are decent. I have an earthquake xt electric impact that makes short work of suspension and lug nuts.
The main downsides of their power tools is the refusal to make them share batteries and that the decent ones get into the Milwaukee/Dewalt tool price areas.
