Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mititelu's commentslogin

That cut makes no sense if you have a generic service that works on any commodity hardware like netflix. Apple does not help or provide your business value. Giving them a cut is stupid and potentially dangerous if they ever launch a competing service.


speed it up 1.5x and its fine


I assume thats because sites dont have access and need a ctrl+v from user to see content


https://www.nginx.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/NGINX-SSL-P....

350 per core per second... you are way off at 100k/s.

If there is such a thing I'd really like to see setup to get it running / try it out myself as well.

do note there are ways to cache ssl data so connections are resumed / avoid handshake again for same user


https://www.nginx.com/blog/testing-performance-nginx-ingress...

60k/second across 24 cores, admittedly on very fast hardware (though not using all the cores that hardware has). Pretty much the same number on 16 cores.

In general, telling someone they're "way off" about performance and citing 6 year old benchmarks isn't a winning plan.

In any case, it's immaterial to what we're discussing. My slow laptop could verify all the signatures for a busy day of updates in a couple seconds, and it's clearly -possible- to put a big fraction of this horsepower in a router.


Thanks for the reference, new benchmark looks nice.

Apologize for the 'way off', its reach-able.

And agree its immaterial to signature checks, but since it was brought up...

Either way, there is probably something holding routers back from reaching that, would be fun to speculate.


accept, reverse engineer, if data is aggregated - send spoofed randomised data, if not - just play back time I actually worked on slower speed and use a VM.

As for price, let them make an offer and see how valuable the data is for them.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: