Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mtron_'s commentslogin

Only 1 lan port and only usb2 is not great...


It's designed to be a wireless router without a lot of extra fluff. If more lan ports are needed, add a switch behind it (though it'd probably be better to have the switch elsewhere unless it's a really simple network). The USB looks like it's used for admin tasks like updating firmware, so I don't see why they'd need to add more than USB2.0.


Uses for a USB3 port:

- An LTE dongle as a fallback for the wired upstream connection.

- An SSD for quick onsite backup / mirror of the most important files.

Nothing critical, and can work via USB2 at 480 Mbps, but USB3 would be nicer.


USB 3.1 brings this new connector, usb-c. Many newer devices use that connector these days and customers may wish for a port with that connector. If you have a laptop with such a port, you'd be able to use a usb-c to usb-c cable to connect it to the router, perhaps for debugging, without needing a usb-c to Ethernet dongle, plus Ethernet cable. Plus not needing to disconnect the single LAN port.


It already has a usb-c connector. No need to patronize me.


USB-C Serial console != USB 3.1 port. Nor does a usb-c power supply port count either.

No need to get defensive, I wasn't the one asking if there was a use for USB > 2.0. If you didn't know before, now you know. If you did already then at most you read a sentence full of information you already knew. Hardly a terrible offense. Other readers who might not have known also now know. :)


I wasn't asking if there was a use for USB 3.1, I am already aware of how it's commonly used on routers (apart from the LTE fallback the other commenter mentioned. That's pretty cool). But even so, your comment didn't list a use for it. You listed uses for usb-c, most of which it seems that it's already capable of. It's not a big deal really, just clarifying.


It's supposed to be a router, not a NAS or switch (bring your own). The LAN port being only 1 gigabit (especially with a 2.5G WAN) makes it a pass for me.


Do you need more than 1 Gbps from your wired network to your internet connection?

Otherwise you may have 2.5G or 10G LAN, or even fiber inside home like some [1], and only have to use the slow 1G to hit the internet from that. (Another 1.5G of bandwidth is available over WiFi.)

[1]: https://sschueller.github.io/posts/wiring-a-home-with-fiber/


If I decide to get 2 gigabit internet, yes (and my local phone and cable companies both offer it). I also run a server in my basement (on ethernet), so not being able to get the entire bandwidth on it would be disappointing.

While it's cool that OpenWRT has their own routers, I feel that this one is not for me.


> The LAN port being only 1 gigabit (especially with a 2.5G WAN) makes it a pass for me.

I think the intended use is the other way around - 1 Gbit WAN, 2.5 Gbit LAN.


Interesting, the Filogic 820 SoC might have USB 3, but I bet it's wired up to the Mini PCI-E port.



It has single USB2/3 port, but the SSUSB pins are shared with PCIe port, so you can't get USB3 and PCIe at the same time (if I'm reading the datasheet right).


I recently took the night train from Innsbruck to Hamburg in a brand new sleeper car run by ÖBB and those are a blast.

Searching for more routes I stumbled across this map and a pretty neat database of available European connections https://back-on-track.eu/night-train-list

Hope to see more connections in the coming years.


Austrian Provider liwest is since many years very transparent about their DNS blocks. All of them are based on court orders / eu sanctions.

https://netzsperre.liwest.at/


the regulator in Austria (RTR) publishes all the blocked domains across all ISPs with information regarding the legal basis for each domain

https://www.rtr.at/TKP/was_wir_tun/telekommunikation/weitere...


So 200ms is curls ipv6 tax on windows. To avoid wasting time on the "IPv6 sinkhole" use -4

Will we get over 50% ipv6 adoption by the end of this decade?


This important communication is being sent to you as a CrashPlan On-Premises customer with an upcoming renewal date of ... We are writing to inform you that Code42 will no longer offer CrashPlan On-Premises. This product will officially end-of-life on February 28, 2022.

We encourage you to: * Transition to CrashPlan Cloud before the end of your current subscription. * Simply let your CrashPlan subscription expire on 2021-12-08 and no longer use CrashPlan On-Premises. * Renew your CrashPlan On-Premises subscription through February 28, 2022, and transition to CrashPlan Cloud or another vendor before March 1, 2022.

<stripped useless marketing bla bla>


Sectigo provides SSL certificates with 1y validity via their certbot compatible Acme endpoint.


They used a very cool way to analyze the Bones. Instead of chopping off samples the bones were put in a plasic Box and a tiny static upbild was enough to kick some molecules out of them which they analyzed and identified the species.


Yes, and this lead to the assumption that neanderthals thought ahead about which bones to use for various tasks.

That's about the gist of this article. Cool new bone sampling tech and an obvious assumption.

Sorry but that was a bit anti-climactic to me. :)


Well, it's obvious if we assume that neanderthals have close mental faculties to our own, but we don't really know that. Abstract thinking and forethought are things that we take for granted but can't just blindly assume other species have the same capabilities. In this sense, I'd say the discovery is meaningful in the sense that it gives us a bit more certainty that they did have a significant forethought capability.

I'm not sure I would jump to the same conclusions, though. Although reindeer bone tools weren't found, maybe that doesn't mean that they weren't made, just that the artifacts didn't survive as well.


Is there a better command for a cronjob to check for available updates? I try to get something like <package name> - <current version> - <updated version>

i currently use

  pkg_add -u -n -I -v 2>&1 | grep 'Adding' | sort -u


> MariaDB 10.0.38

Can anyone share some insight why OpenBSD does not provide a more recent MariaDB Version ?


ok, found it.

http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/Update-MariaDB-fro...

10.2 is a no go for us as the new client library requires atomic ops killing the client library on a handful of archs.


It could be a lack of resources or they are just very conservative in upgrading.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: