The endgame is owning equity assets which represent ownership in companies that make profits? I hold these valuable assets and then sell them in the future. What else could it be?
The assets are valuable because they represent ownership of the most productive companies on the planet?
I think the comparison TikTok and Philip Morris tracks. Both spent insane amounts of money and talent optimizing the bad choices the addict could make.
This kind of argument doesn't bother to demonstrate the parallel in the logic. This bad form of argumentation should be labelled non rigorous. Then I would've have read it at all.
You never bothered explaining why saltwater is ai writing and readers are cells, nor what the parallel of immersion or osmotic pressure would be.
You lazily wanted me to fill in the details and be convinced. Why did you create this bad argument and leave it unlabelled.
The assets are valuable because they represent ownership of the most productive companies on the planet?
reply