Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | not_good_coder's commentslogin

The authoritative sources of medical information is debatable in general. Chatting with initial results to ask for a breakdown of sources with classified recommendations is a logical 2nd step for context.


Follow-up paywalled article: How to enter the USA


I have found that for RAG use cases where the source can be document or web data, hallucinations can still occur. This is largely driven by the prompt and alignment to the data available for processing and re-ranking.


While we don't know who is making the components, check out https://www.enovix.com/ for batteries. Samira is from Meta and previously worked on XR... https://ir.enovix.com/management/samira-naraghi


Enovix is putting next gen batteries into production. They've been through FAT and SAT... so you know it's real. I'm also an investor, but like the tech.


I am here trying to find this out.


Remotely Operated Vehicle


(it is mentioned in the article, but only after a few pages in)


Can someone explain why it's going to take 2 years to bring a piece of plastic to the market?


This is the right answer!


The developer of the vaccine should not sponsor this adverse effects trial.


Careful, the news told me that's what conspiracy theorists would say.


It's kind of sad cause ideally the company using a portion of the money they made on the product, to study adverse effects from the product, is the responsible and transparent thing to do. I wonder what options there are for ensuring/verifying that this kind of research is not swayed or influenced by the sponsors.


Same


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: