The authoritative sources of medical information is debatable in general. Chatting with initial results to ask for a breakdown of sources with classified recommendations is a logical 2nd step for context.
I have found that for RAG use cases where the source can be document or web data, hallucinations can still occur. This is largely driven by the prompt and alignment to the data available for processing and re-ranking.
Enovix is putting next gen batteries into production. They've been through FAT and SAT... so you know it's real. I'm also an investor, but like the tech.
It's kind of sad cause ideally the company using a portion of the money they made on the product, to study adverse effects from the product, is the responsible and transparent thing to do. I wonder what options there are for ensuring/verifying that this kind of research is not swayed or influenced by the sponsors.