Or just unlikely to get diagnosed since all the vegans I know also have low trust in medicine.

One would think that you'd get a much more accurate results (e.g. control more variables) from looking at a cohort that lives meters away from nuclear power plants for months each year to study, e.g. personnel on nuclear subs, ships and carriers.

Few brands own their names in more than one (or a handful) of TLDs, because it's pointless and a waste of money.

"Big Interview" is a registered trademark and you have provided the evidence that you've registered their trademark at different TLD's in bad faith so they can easily claim the domains.

Actually, the evidence shows the opposite of 'bad faith.'

I reached out to them directly with a transfer offer of just $799—which is essentially the registration cost and minor labor—specifically to help them secure their brand before someone else did. I didn't ask for thousands; I asked for a 'thank you' and a cost-recovery fee.

For a 'world-leading AI platform,' claiming that owning your .ai TLD is 'pointless' is like a bank saying they don't need to lock the back door because they have a trademark on the front door. Trademark doesn't prevent a phishing attack or a competitor from causing confusion; proactive security does.

They didn't ignore a 'squatter'; they ignored a professional heads-up.

Average pricing for a .ai domain is $150

You appear to have too much time on your hands, and no, not everyone should have to live in your reality.

True. Clustering on a map is usually a sign that a map was setup by someone that doesn't use it or has no interest in the data.

Yes, the ECMWF has been the world leader in this for a decade or more. All those AI models are trained on ECMWF's ERA reanalysis.

I regularly search for new repos in my field and about half the results these days are half-baked, botched or basic stuff driven by AI.

I would imagine it is, yes. That's even true of my own repos.

Linking to a page deep in the archive sure won't help things out.

It's an example and what I had. It's intermittent and not 100% reproducible. So what value are you adding by complaining, which also absolutely won't help that you are accusing me of?

The number of idiotic vibe coded repos I've seen on GH lately that are doing things like crawling OSM for POI data is mindboggling!

Looks promising! I have a project in the summer that is collecting various data (lidar, drone images for photogrammetry etc) in a remote area and I will definetly try this out. The idea is to sync files up as soon as possible via 4/5G and Starlink using BondiX. Have you considered supporting multiple uplinks/bonding in Keryx?

Great use case! Remote data collection with mixed uplinks is exactly the kind of scenario where intelligent routing matters. Currently, Keryx doesn't natively support multi-uplink bonding at the application layer, it relies on the OS routing table and picks the best available route. However, if BondiX is presenting the bonded connection as a single virtual interface to the OS, Keryx should work transparently over it. We've tested over various network types (fibre, cable, 5G, Starlink, etc individually) and the ML strategy selection adapts well to changing conditions. Multi-uplink support at the Keryx level is on the roadmap - essentially treating multiple paths as independent channels and doing our own aggregation/failover. The transport layer we're using makes this technically feasible. For your summer project, my suggestion would be:

Test with BondiX doing the bonding (should work today) Let me know how it performs - real-world feedback from field deployments is gold If you need native multi-path support, happy to prioritize that feature based on your timeline

Happy to stay in touch as your project develops. Feel free to email david@netviper.gr if you want to discuss the specifics of your setup, or if you are interested in testing out the GUI application.

Isn't this the admin that fought for the TAKE IT DOWN act?

Feels like everyone completely forgot about this. The White House made a big stink about AI deepfakes in their first couple of months and then proceeds to publish them at blinding speed. No hint of irony or self-awareness.