Founder here, to start, this is absolutely prototype technology and it is not ready to be sold or used for anything beyond test. This started as a regular digital ledger, turned into some moderate contributions to the academic theory, but not much in terms practical innovation.
From there we achieve a pretty remarkable result. To compare this to non superconductor LK99, we've made it the professors and other experts achieving similar results and improving our crude process. That doesn't mean it works, that means it shows promise as is worth sharing that we've made it this far.
The innovation in question is a quantum resilient EU-CMA digital signature algorithm that's a little bit smaller than RSA in communication cost. [This is where everyone usually reacts, please, take a moment if you need].
Now. Yes, it's a drop in replacement for RSA with compute and memory cost that is 'good enough' without full optimization.
While I was aware that novel cryptography is covered under the EAR as dual use, I was a bit surprised when we were upgraded to ITAR, but it happened. Category 13(b) on the USML, and not really any way around it. As it was privately developed we ARE allowed to talk about it, but NOT transfer it without an export license.
The plan is go through the academic buff and polish, the full standardization process and certification, and then apply to for export licenses domestically and abroad. This is exactly why we're happy to announce we added former Army General Patrick Huston to our Board of advisors. His legal expertise is a great help.
Unless you teach cryptography, please wait for the expert results before coming to a definitive conclusion. The point of this post is to provide a little hope for people, especially those working on constrained networks. Somebody seems to have found a solution to this massive problem, hopefully.
PS The information on the website is out of date, won't provide you much usable information... because that would be a transfer. If you really want to disprove me, and have the capability, something can certainly be arranged.
I am surprised at all of this myself, but, that's the timeline we're on.
From there we achieve a pretty remarkable result. To compare this to non superconductor LK99, we've made it the professors and other experts achieving similar results and improving our crude process. That doesn't mean it works, that means it shows promise as is worth sharing that we've made it this far.
The innovation in question is a quantum resilient EU-CMA digital signature algorithm that's a little bit smaller than RSA in communication cost. [This is where everyone usually reacts, please, take a moment if you need].
Now. Yes, it's a drop in replacement for RSA with compute and memory cost that is 'good enough' without full optimization.
While I was aware that novel cryptography is covered under the EAR as dual use, I was a bit surprised when we were upgraded to ITAR, but it happened. Category 13(b) on the USML, and not really any way around it. As it was privately developed we ARE allowed to talk about it, but NOT transfer it without an export license.
The plan is go through the academic buff and polish, the full standardization process and certification, and then apply to for export licenses domestically and abroad. This is exactly why we're happy to announce we added former Army General Patrick Huston to our Board of advisors. His legal expertise is a great help.
Unless you teach cryptography, please wait for the expert results before coming to a definitive conclusion. The point of this post is to provide a little hope for people, especially those working on constrained networks. Somebody seems to have found a solution to this massive problem, hopefully.
PS The information on the website is out of date, won't provide you much usable information... because that would be a transfer. If you really want to disprove me, and have the capability, something can certainly be arranged.
I am surprised at all of this myself, but, that's the timeline we're on.