Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | preparat's commentslogin

I think I saw this on reddit years ago:

Programmer's wife: "when you go to the store, can you buy a carton of milk and if they have eggs, get six."

He comes back with 6 cartons of milk. Wife: "why would you buy six cartons of milk?"

"Well, they had eggs"


The next time she says to him, "while you're at the store, pick up some bananas."

Legend says he's at the store still.


Programmers will also use up all the shampoo if the label says "lather, rinse, repeat" with no explicit termination condition.


Since when do programmers read the documentation?


That one can be attributed to Grace Hopper.


Fortunately showering doesn't appear to be common in the profession



I get it, she’s upset that he didn’t get 7, which is technicallly what she meant.


Bookmarked! This is excellent, thank you.


Could people start wearing small transmitters that nearby autonomous vehicles can read?


Please no. You should not be required to carry a beacon in order to be safe walking around a city or crossing a street.


The woman who was hit ran across the road. It's easy to be safe: don't do that.


Am I supposed to get in a car to cross the street?


You could hail an Uber.


Use a crosswalk?


Sure, when they're available. Have you looked at the area where the woman was hit?


People are supposed to wear bright clothing when walking at night or biking. Maybe we can have an optional beacon..


I like that idea! Gonna buy a bunch of those, amplify their signal and spread them throughout the city I live in. That will ensure that there's not going to be a single crappy autonomous car being beta-tested in my vicinity!

Another idea would be to just throw them right in front of an autonomous vehicle at full speed. Let's test those brakes!

(sorry, but the original idea is just so ridiculous that I am incapable of responding in a non-sarcastic way to this...)


A technology/IoT solution to a problem that should never exist in the first place, brilliant!


I imagine phones will serve that role eventually. GPS chip accuracy is improving constantly and could be accurate to within a foot in some phones in the next year [1]. Google Maps / Waze already do something similar with predicting traffic times based on phone data (and other sources). GPS accuracy currently may make an individual's location slightly harder, but path prediction may help. (And, of course there are privacy concerns to consider.)

[1] https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2017/9/25/16362296/g...


So if you're homeless and can't afford a phone or if you forgot yours at home or if you got pickpocketed... you can expect to get hit by a self driving car?


Such devices exist and they are LED lights that pedestrians and bicyclists already use.


That sounds like something that will immediately be abused for tracking people, and an over-reliance on it may make it more dangerous for people not carrying one (don't want to, can't afford, signal blocked by item/clothing, simply forget etc.).


That was easy to see coming... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16620315


Better than a transmitter would be a passive retroreflector. I believe these are even already available on the market.


This is about as feasible as putting smart chips in all roads so that cars know where the lanes are.


Roads are generally marked, and often have elements embedded in the surface (e.g. [1]). As self-driving cars become more prevalent, I don't see why you wouldn't adjust new/replaced markings to be something more readable by those vehicles. It obviously can't be the only signal used (because it's infeasible to change everything immediately, not all roads are marked, and wear/damage may make them unusable) but it may help improve reliability/accuracy.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%27s_eye_(road)


> This is about as feasible as putting smart chips in all roads so that cars know where the lanes are.

Lanes are marked, usually. So why not embed something like an UV/IR-only color pigment in the lanes? Invisible so it doesn't affect human drivers but can easily be picked up by cameras.


About 3 years ago I started martial arts training. One of the first things I had to unlearn was shallow chest breathing. Imagine that, 40yrs old and having to relearn how to breathe properly. It took me probably close to 6 months to adjust.


Yeah, I was surprised how long it took me to realize the error in my breathing. In hindsight, my athletic life before 21 could have benefited greatly from breathing "right".


And I'm pretty sure adding a second GPU later shouldn't be a problem.

Link to list: https://pcpartpicker.com/list/yrHxYT


Matlab, because the opportunity presented itself at work. I have no formal programming training, just huge interest. Learning bits of Python now.


Wonder how they would deal with forks, if it's an issue at all.


It's cash settled based off the price of an index, which makes it easier. They just defer to the folks making the index.

If it was physically settled you could squeeze the shorts by having a last-minute unilateral grant of a side-token to everyone who possesses the underlying. The shorts have to come up with the token or cover the contract - either way, you have people who are forced to buy it to cover contractual obligations, and you probably own the only exchange capable of making transactions with NewToken (and maybe also you pre-mined some of bonus tokens to sell?)

When its cash settled, this is much less of an issue. No market? No market price, so it doesn't get included in constructing the index.


Probably not too differently from how equity exchange products deal with corporate events like mergers and spinoffs.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: