Please note that English is clearly not my native language. Sometimes, I may structure sentences in ambiguous ways due to grammatical or other errors in my writing. I'm not sure if this is the case.
To avoid further misinformation, let me elaborate what I meant to say in the paragraph you have mentioned. It's quoted below for other readers' comfort.
> But if you will use it, keep in mind that it uses Bolt as its data backend. The same Bolt used in the HashiCorp Vault integrated Raft storage and in etcd. Hence, it may need some maintenance too. More specifically, database compaction.
As per InfluxDB documentation, "InfluxDB uses BoltDB to store data including organization and user information, UI data, REST resources, and other key value data." (see here: https://docs.influxdata.com/influxdb/v2/reference/config-opt...). To me that's exactly what a data backend means. This piece of software uses different backends for different types of data if I got it right.
Since I haven't had any experience with InfluxDB itself, it's not clear to me whether its BoltDB storage may (or may not) need maintenance. In my opinion it's just a little detail that may be helpful for some people, so I mentioned it.
It's possible for me to redact this part of the text for more clarification, but that information by itself isn't very important to make me do that.
> There is at least one basic factual error in this blog post, which makes me discount the whole thing.
Everyone makes mistakes, that's why all of us filter and interpret information based on our experience accumulated through years of living on this planet. Such a radical change of perception to a large piece of information caused by a small mistake is not always necessary.
Again, thanks for being interested in making corrections! Have a great rest of your day!
However, if your company has already highly invested into using Docker, the fact of something working OOTB in any other piece of software doesn't convince to make a decision to switch.
On top of that, our DevOps team is pretty happy with Docker :)
We have over a dozen of production servers. Both our DevOps engineers and developers have access to these servers in case something needs to be fixed or configured.
Possibly, the web server was down due to a large number of requests. I have a lot of stuff on the server running in containers, but limited my httpd instance to 1 CPU core and 1 GB of RAM. Better upgrade it, I guess.
