Residents on non-immigrant visas are getting a raw deal. The world has got bigger problems but this really sucks.

CopyFile(src: "foo", dest: "bar");

    new FileInfo(srcPath).CopyTo(dstPath)

    File.Copy(sourceFileName,destFileName);

  new FileInfo(srcPath).CopyTo(dstPath);

  CopyFile(src: srcPath, dest: dstPath);

e.g.

  new FileInfo(pathA).CopyTo(pathB);
  CopyFile(src: pathB, dest: pathA);

If you can't keep track of your variable names, then using keyword arguments, like others here talk about, won't help much, either.

I'd definitely agree with you that the not having named arguments is worse than your method chained example.

To me named parameters seem to be on a par with the chained OO api.

    File.Copy(a,b)

    File.Copy(sourceFileName: a, destFileName: b)

    File.Copy(destFileName: b, sourceFileName: a)

It would be better to have a foolproof API, but obviously it can't change now.

I'm relatively new to SF but find the random interactions here beneficial in much the same way with regards to personal growth, and they seem to happen all the time. In the UK it felt like you can't talk to strangers - here it feels like you can't _not_ talk to strangers.

So not sure if it's SF, California, or Americans in general, but it's refreshing for someone who is usually quite introverted.

But when I do, in London, I've never once had a negative experience.

On the contrary, as soon as people here realise you're not trying to sell them something, or get anything from them, they tend to fall over themselves to be nice, and I've had people start pouring out their life story after just a simple 'how are you today?' to a shop assistant I'd only seen once or twice ever, because I actually waited for an answer.

I think a lot of people in London go around so starved for any kind of contact that as long as you're not acting totally creepy most people will be very open to it.

The hard thing with London is that you need to actually actively push past an expectation of not talking to people.

I actually find California more frustrating because while it's easy to get into a conversation, it's impossible for me to tell what is just pleasantries from when people are actually invested in a conversation.

10-30ms is a bit optimistic, depending on how large you define a geography. Many ADSL/VDSL connections, best case, start with 5ms of latency, and often higher (say 20ms) due to interleaving. Cable tends to be around 10ms IIRC but can suffer from significant jitter which makes things worse. So for a lot of players the servers would need to be in the same city to achieve that target.

Just checked my fiber connection and it has 2ms of latency. google.com is 18ms away. I'm in Portugal and seem to be routed to a Google server 400+ km away in Spain. So my memory of playing on 10-20ms to local servers in Portugal is probably accurate. Covering the US or the EU with enough servers so everyone is never more than 30ms away seems feasible. Within easy reach of a startup with just ~50 VMs across different cloud provider locations and for popular games easy for users to setup regional servers themselves.

IIRC QW's client side movement prediction didn't attempt to predict the effects of, for instance, shooting a rocket at your feet/rocket jumping, which meant on high latency connections there'd often be a bit of a delay before your view caught up with where the server thought you actually were. This also applies to rockets fired by other players. Lower latency had the effect of not only making it easier to fire rockets at enemy players, it also made everything seem smoother when people fired rockets at you.

Later versions of QW created from the GPL source release have introduced lag compensation for hitscan weapons, but I'm not aware of any attempts to do so for projectiles.