Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ricopags's commentslogin

I say don't muddy the water with the public panic over "will it won't it" bubble burst predictions.

The effective demand for Opus 4.5 is bottomless; the models will only get better.

People will always want a code model as good as we have now, let alone better.

Bun securing default status in the best coding model is a win-win-win


Opus 4.5 is not living in vacuum. It’s the most expensive of models for coders and there is Gemini 3 pro - with many discounts and deepseek 3.2 that is 50x cheaper and not much behind.


> I say don't muddy the water with the public panic over "will it won't it" bubble burst predictions.

It does matter. The public ultimately determines how much they get in funding if at all.

> The effective demand for Opus 4.5 is bottomless; the models will only get better.

The demand for the Internet is bottomless. Doesn't mean Dotcom didn't crash.

There are lots of scenarios this can play out, e.g. Anthropic fails to raise a certain round because money dried up. OpenAI buys Anthropic but decides they don't need Bun and closes out the project.


Cooperation with the eval admins


not wrong, per se, but it's far from the first time


depends on the hyperparams but one of the biggest benefits of a latent space is transfer between modalities


in a bunch of azure data centers?

https://datacenters.microsoft.com/globe/explore/


ASU's Center for Science and Imagination has a project[0] specific to this that they launched[1] in 2014

[0]https://csi.asu.edu/category/optimism/ [1]https://csi.asu.edu/project-archive/optimism/science-fiction...


Lovely CSS and nice content chunking, but perhaps overly biased towards finding utility with LLMs as there is too little information about cautions to take.

Most egregiously, on the AI is stateless page[0], it shows relying on an llm reponse to call a program via sudo. I can't think of a system where a professional programmer could justify such a risk.

I think after "AI predicts text" it makes less sense to say "AI is just another API" than something like "AI makes APIs fuzzy" because the stochasticity makes an AI API anything but "just another API." Most people think of APIs as deterministic in function, AFAIK.

[0]https://www.aiexplainer.dev/stateless


I /feel/ similarly intuition-wise. But models are crazy and what they respond to is often unpredictable. There are no lungs in an AI model but nonetheless 'take a deep breath' as a prompt has shown[0] improvement on math scores lol

Personally I strongly disapprove of the first/second person pronouns and allowing them [encouraging, even] to output 'we' when talking about humans.

[0] https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/09/telli...


Possibly because it dovetails with pharma mfg and [potentially] food mfg. Could see a case made for enzymatically brewed 'meat inks' [very sorry for this term ;p] for 3d printing the next gen of lab meats.


Certain based on anything other than instinctive surmise?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: