Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rk06's commentslogin

Vercel owns nuxt and sveltekit, so they do benefit. only nextjs suffers from not being on vite.

vite+ is a cli tool and open source, which is built on top of vite.

void is a deployment platform and sdk which is built on top of cloudflare and vite. void will be paid offerring


This was a big surprise. but a good one!

it is not. lack of plugin support is sufficient to block adoptions among other things.

but it has plugin support? what kind of plugins you mean?

look at plugin api limiation here:

https://esbuild.github.io/plugins/#svelte-plugin

esbuild's plugin support is limited which is why vite had to use rollup for prod build.


most likely they are not running the prod build on latest mac. so it is slower.

Really the enterprise partner supports next, but not vanilla js sounds stupid? Honestly I expect them to prioritize nextjs and react given the popularity, but still be open to vanilla js.

I checked sitecore cloud to have special integration for nextjs and reactjs. But it also support vanilla js as well.

Are there really anyone who is exclusive to nextjs?


Vanilla JS is "supported" if you write the missing parts, e.g. layout service, visual editing integration,...

In many places they will say it is supported, but when you look into the details only React/Next.js work out of the box without additional work.

A bit like you can deploy Next.js on Vercel, or do it yourself somewhere else.


I think this is a bit unreasonable. there are a lot of people applying to every job post. if a company can use AI to better filter the candidates, then it is an improvement.

there is issue only if AI is encoded with human bias, but treated as neutral and impartial judge


No, it isn't remotely unreasonable. It is completely disrespectful of a candidate to make them "interview" with a bot. I'm not going to work for a company which disrespects me in that way right up front.

"disrespect" is doing quite a heavy lifting here. if the company is honest and upfront about it, why do you consider it any different from automated coding test or the implicit Resume scanner?

Ultimately, a company has to filter job applications and find the right fit. and I consider a number of things companies actually do to be very disrespectful and demeaning. for eg: getting interviewed by clueless HR who have zero techinical expertise, not sharing salary range in advance, asking leetcode hard questions, forcing AI bullshit etc

With that framing, i consider AI interview to be less disrespectful and something i am ok with.


You're completely wrong.

"better" is an objective evaluation that you can do in a test, not in an interview with an AI.

And AIs always have human bias encoded, because it's trained on human data. That's a well known problem with no absolute solution.


Interview is a two-way communication. Just as companies evaluating the candidates, the candidates are also evaluating the company.

How would the company feels if the people applying uses AI avatar to answer the interview questions too?


I am assuming that all interviews are not AI, and it is only initial filter. if not, then i will filter the company out!!

Would you be okay with applicants using AI for these interviews? If I have thousands of applications out and I can use AI to better filter the companies I want to work for then it's an improvement.

if someone responded with a lot of PR comments, I would set up a meeting directly and avoid unnecessary discussion on PR.

all apple needs, to kill surface laptops entirely, is to enable windows to run on m series laptops without issues.

I don't know why the downvotes, maybe someone can chime in if there is more to surface laptop? because i am using one laptop, and much prefer to use windows on M4 macbook pro instead.


I’m not sure that many people want Windows badly enough they would get an Apple device and remove the original OS so they could run Windows.

From my personal experience, Widows users in general don’t mind Windows, but, definitely, nobody I have ever met finds it more desirable than macOS.


The games industry remains a hotbed of people that vehemently hate Apple, even those that have never touched a Mac.

Part of it historically was a sort of Visual Studio induced Stockholm Syndrome, where for a long time if you were doing C++ work that was the only sane way to go.

There are some companies that even filter potential employees on this basis.


Apple leaves gamers alone, it does not even attempt to be a nontrivial gaming platform and makes no promises. Why would gamers and gamedevs hate it? It just doesn't exist in their market.

Its a computer. People are gonna try and play computer games on it.

Was Sony making their MIPS workstations when they introduced their MIPS-based PlayStation? Sounds like a nice distinction between work and play. ;-)

Curiously the Sega game Columns was licensed from the HP UX original.

From the noises that occur whenever you force a Windows loving gamedev to use a Mac the first major "problem" is mouse acceleration.

Which companies?

Sounds like a nice blacklist to have.

Don't have to remove anything. This used to be possible on Macs with bootcamp as they called it.

Bootcamp was a hedge when Apple was a lot less dominant than it is now.

When Apple transitioned from PowerPC to Intel, it wasn’t clear that was going to work. Being able to boot into Windows was sort of an insurance policy that’s no longer necessary.


It made migration from Windows to Mac easier. Now that Office can run in a browser and the Mac has first tier support for the desktop version, and a lot more of the usual software is delivered either as web applications or portable apps on top of a browser runtime, being able to boot Windows is a lot less relevant.

wine already runs on Mac so really they would just need something like dxvk to have a package similar to proton

To be honest if Apple wanted to they could work with valve to make gaming on Mac a reality

To some degree it should already be possible with wine + dxvk + moltenvk


Oh man I'd pay premium for a sleek device like this that CAN'T run Windows or Mac OS. Just a mere thought of being able to run pure Linux on that sweet sweet apple silicon with full driver support makes my juices flowing.

FYI: Apple added support for Linux containers to macOS Tahoe [1].

[1]: https://github.com/apple/container


There will never be an Apple Silicon device without the ability to run an Apple OS.

Just run MacOS.


I know and I'd rather just stop using modern tech than willingly go back to Apple or Microsoft software.

Who cares about Windows anymore?

Kids are happy with iOS/Android devices

Google docs solves 90% of Office use cases


Google Docs might handle 50% of people who use Office, but I doubt if it handles 25% of Office use cases. Few use every feature of Office but someone uses every feature of Office and all those power user cases that are different can’t be handled by Google Docs. Or even Web Office.

many people do. i work for Microsoft and don't have option to use mac os

Well, last I checked most people don't work for MS so I reckon their experience might be a bit different

I believe you’re being downvoted because your logic is from 20+ years ago when Windows compatibility was important.

Also the era when companies were trying to “kill” each other’s devices is no longer a thing.

They all get the reality it’s a multi device world and they need to work within it.


I assume you’re downvoted because Microsoft has to want that.

rolldown is in RC. it is open for private preview so they can detect and fix bugs.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: