I like the look into the process of A/B testing, but what is not obvious that for large amounts of data multiple columns is going to be more effective?
Sorry. That was a typo. Do you think that your data shows a clear number of items were it makes sense to use multiple columns. It looks like to me that the multiple column layout is more effective, but I can't see a clear cut-off point.
Having tried it on my phone, I think that you may have failed to account for the orientation of the device. The single column was better on my phone, as it was portrait. On my desktop the multi column version was better presumably as it was landscape.
I don't think the data is clear enough, agreed. Unless there is a better way to compare, we might actually build both and let the user decide. So long as our targets for speed and accuracy are achieved.
Apple has assets of around $321.686 billion, whereas Samsung is worth around 1.64601505816 times more with assets of around $529.5 billion. Therefore Apple is not only worth less than Samsung, but is heavily over valued.
Apple has over $200B in cash alone. And does close to $40B a year in profits. Calling them heavily overvalued when their market cap is only $600B is ridiculous.
Talking about assets as if they are that important is so weird. How would you rate finance companies and other sorts of companies with tons of assets. They would be insanely undervalued according to your "analysis"
So Samsung has an Market Cap of 500B and Asset of 529?
What are those asset? How many of them are cash? What is its P/E? This is like saying the largest insurance has trillion of asset and therefore they are all under valued.
