Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sgt's commentslogin

"That’s not a coincidence. That’s a deliberate choice."

Please just stop with this AI slop. Flagged


I get the anger lol, but that’s literally how I would say it in my native language too. That part is me.

Come on, that article is total AI slop and you know it. Every sentence has signs. Just do better next time and we'll read it and give you a chance.

Ironically a true statement, eh? It's not a coincidence, the blog's author chose to leave that all in

I'm actually looking for a model that is able to create old school pixel art (like 90s style, games like Sierra and so on). But to this date, I haven't seen anything yet. It all reeks of "AI slop". Maybe this is a good thing, I don't know. But if anyone has any tips, I'd appreciate. It's for my own personal use.

Might lower the prices of Mac Minis, Studios etc though

No, those use LPDDR5(x), not HBM.

How does it compare to the Samsung flagship phone cameras? I have to say I was impressed by the Samsung cameras, although being Android based it's not really an option for me. It'd be like trading a Porsche 911 for a Pontiac Aztec.

> although being Android based it's not really an option for me. It'd be like trading a Porsche 911 for a Pontiac Aztec.

I use GrapheneOS for my own phone and have always been forced into iPhones at work.

iOS, after 12 years of use, is still so terrible that I can't just get over it.

I open my MacBook and will do whatever needs to be done from there.

I should probably get an iPhone for private use too though. It would surely stop me from being on my phone more than I'd like to.


Android doesn’t have a single decent calendar app. The apps that do exist and are cross platform are _almost always_ a worse version of the iOS app. I tried making the switch to Graphene and even after giving in and using the Play store to find apps, it was just impossible.

The launchers were fine, but the app experience being abysmal just made Android a non-starter. I don’t understand how people don’t see this.

RCS didn’t even work as well as it does on iPhone.

And this isn’t a walled garden comparison - I don’t use iCloud or any Apple services aside from iMessage (for people who don’t have signal).

Try using a self-hosted calendar on Android - absolutely impossible if you have any expectation of it being usable. And no, an unreliable third party app that promises to sync in the background does not count, mostly because it doesn’t work well. iCalendar works. You should not need to buy Business Calendar 2 to get a worse version of what iPhone users get for free.

There are a half dozen apps at least I could tell a similar story about.


I disagree strongly with "iCalendar works". Basic sync to Google Calendar causes weird artefacts and notifications (like getting event invites for events that are already accepted).

I also strongly dislike the iOS Calendar UI, though that's possibly also because of iOS itself being rather unintuitive. Floating buttons in four corners of the screen just isn't very clear. In my opinion Google Calendar, even on iOS, is much better. More reliable on iOS too, but Google's app syncing better with Google's servers isn't really a good comparison.

I have no problem syncing with DAVx5 across various iCal sources on my phone. iOS seems pretty funky about its protocol requirements (and if it fails to understand the protocol, it's hard to tell why it failed). Apple practically invented the protocol, they should offer some kind of explanation of why it's not working.

That said, I do think Google should invest more into getting third party calendar support into their GCalendar apps. I don't want to need a third party app even if the app works fine, it should be part of the standard calendar app.


The nice thing about calendar app is it uses a system-wide database that other apps can use. So my TickTick app can show my self-hosted Synology calendar events alongside my work Outlook calendar events, and TickTick doesn’t have to do anything special. Android has a similar system but the integration is far less consistent and Google Calendar (the only calendar app approaching decent) doesn’t play nice with it.

The big differentiator is speed of input. On iOS I can drag and drop to move, and also to adjust the start and end time of events, all without clicking into every event. This is huge if you time block your day. It was insane to me that Android just couldn’t support this workflow without being brutally, painfully slow.

> Floating buttons in four corners of the screen just isn't very clear.

It’s just a toolbar with a transparent background. I don’t see how that causes confusion. It’s not like they move around or something. And this pattern is used in basically all apps. Not nearly as bad an abomination as the FAB, IMO.


I absolutely agree. I tried switching to Android but calendar and task support is abysmal on Android if you don’t use Google Suite. I simply do not trust that any of those 3rd party Android apps will do the job. Too many times something disappeared, hasn’t updated, or otherwise failed. The UX is also a complete clusterf*k. It’s seriously bad and I assume people don’t talk about it much because most use Google services anyway.

Oh you know what as someone who has used android from the start ever since i had a smartphone. You are 100% correct the only halfway decent calendar app is Google Calendar and even that is mostly meh.

I seriously don't understand what people are doing on a phone that iOS doesn't handle. I'd love to know what kind of interesting use case someone like yourself gets up to.

I can understand you disliking an OS or vendor after getting used to another one, but there's no 911-Aztec comparison that makes sense here.

You're confusing a personal preference for a fact.


Always being five years behind everyone and doing its own boneheaded decisions that they inevitably have to walk back does tend to make Apple the Aztec in this case.

Mockery aside: it's all the same. They're all good enough for portraits where all you want is some depth of field & contrast, they're all good enough for landscapes where they capture colors pretty well, and they're all catastrophic past 5x zoom. You can take the top 10 of DXOMark (hell, the top 20) and you won't realistically find a difference unless you're pixel peeping. Which, we all know your phone pictures are just being sent compressed over Whatsapp, it doesn't matter. If you want camera quality pictures, get a camera. Even a 15 year old shitty Canon will take better pictures than the 18 Pro.


That’s harsh - the Aztek was not that bad …

Like trading something flashy, fast and impractical for something ugly and practical (idk if Azteks were fast but I suspect not notably so). I don’t know if it works for the camera phone comparison.

I drove an Aztek once and it felt fast enough for regular city driving. Why anyone would _need_ a faster car is beyond me.


And not blindly vibe coded.

It could help people. It's possible the sigabrt didn't even care to Google about Healthchecks.io before I decided to vibe code his own.

Also, what do you really think the odds are that sigabrt.dev will still exist in 2 years from now? Or 5?


Tried running 8088MPH but it just freezes shortly after the "Thanks for running on real hardware!"

Did you pick some other video card besides CGA?

Yes, I chose EGA. My bad. That demo must be run with CGA.

Will this become a trend? When the client asks you for an architecture diagram, you respond with a 3d world.

Which is modeled in Unity which you can walk around in VR...for kicks maybe though could unlock something in the mind...spatial computing is an interesting field.

VRML came and went decades ago, it never really took off.

You mean, like this?

https://imgur.com/a/pmtihO1

That's a user error, you simply had "This Mac" selected (preselected) instead of narrowing scope to be Applications.


This is such a clueless take, and I see it surprisingly often. Declarative UI does not inherently mean virtual DOM nor does it "automatically" mean slower than UIKit.

The abstraction is huge advantage, especially when targeting different devices and screen sizes. We (and that includes Apple) have been learning the value of those kinds of abstraction boundaries for years, well before React.

It's also important to note that SwiftUI and UIKit are composable, so if some small part of your app needs low-level, finer grained control, then go ahead and use UIKit/Core Animation/Metal and SwiftUI for the rest.


Yes, declarative UI is just an abstraction of imperative code. :) The rest is properties of the internal implementation. The VDOM way obfuscates the internals more. Doesn't let you control rendering appropriately. It is so because the diffing and reconciliation algorithm have to be able to remove any subtree of views/nodes from the UI tree.

Then you can only have islands of either paradigm within each other. UIKit and SwiftUI do indeed compose, albeit coarsely.

I can't blame them, they got influenced by react. Don't even blame react, it was a good attempt. Basically trying to build a UI from a snapshot of a tree. Except this is too simplistic a model. They designed it as if you could equate the number of games and the number of positions in chess. Like a markov chain. Except playing chess has side effects. A mere snapshot does not encode those.

I understand the mistake.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: