chatgpt gets it right. maybe you are using free or non thinking version?

https://chatgpt.com/share/6994d25e-c174-800b-987e-9d32c94d95...

It means price has decreased by 3 times in a few months.

Did you see the graph benchmark? I found it quite interesting. It had to do a graph traversal on a natural text representation of a graph. Pretty much your problem.

Update: I took a corpus of personal chat data (this way it wouldn't be seen in training), and tried asking it some paraphrased questions. It performed quite poorly.

Which models did you try?

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Oh, interesting!

I wonder what difference have people found with sonnet 4.5 and opus 4.5 and probably similar delta will remain.

Was sonnet 4.5 much worse than opus?

Sonnet 4.5 was a pretty significant improvement over Opus 4.

Yes but it’s easier to understand difference between 4.5 sonnet and opus and apply that difference to opus 4.6

I'm not sure what your comment is trying to say.

>They would only decrease much later, after a long period of social conflict, economic growth, and technological progress.

The technological process mentioned here as Industrial Revolution, was the necessary step. It was not primarily social conflicts.

The above poster is making exactly the same point.

You are right that there was an aberration in the middle where people worked way more hours but this was when things were consolidating.

But your post implies that the preference of people was to work less hours as opposed to work more hours and earn more money, which is not the case.

you are conflating equity and equality. its equalising in the sense that it democratises access to data, knowledge. but that does not mean it will end up with everyone being equal in terms of wealth.

But it won't even do that. In the pursuit of extracting maximal capital, better models with "better" knowledge will be gated behind higher prices. If you pay more, you get more.

induced demand is a good thing - it means there is more utility going around.

I would like to get actual numbers.

1. how many people died because of lead poisoning, air pollution?

2. how many people were saved and had qualitatively better lives because of automobiles?

Not true because it is still exposed in API

And saved in files

And even visible in the UI via Ctrl+o.

>The latest "meta" in AI programming appears to be agent teams (or swarms or clusters or whatever) that are designed to run for long periods of time autonomously.

more reason to catch them otherwise we have to wait a longer time. in fact hiding is more correct if the AI was less autonomous right?