Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | singletonbingle's commentslogin

Why would you expect to hear back? How can a company reply to every person that applies for a position? If they’re interested, they’ll respond. It’s like Tinder. They got your email. Don’t get upset because one startup (that’s likely going to fail) didn’t like your resume more than other ones, or hasn’t gotten to it.

This is “nice guy” behavior.


If they read the mail, it doesn’t take much longer to reply a no with some copy/pasta. It is basic respect.


Ridiculous! There are maybe hundreds of resumes being scanned. How could you do anything other than send a generic response? Why would you want a generic reply saying “yup, got your resume, email still works...”

Show yourself some respect and stop complaining about being rejected. You sent an email, they didn’t reply, ignore it.

Not one reply gave a good rationale...downvote all you want.


There's a difference to getting your feelings hurt and expecting a little decency. A company the solicits applications should definitely be held to the later.


Respect and decency is a 2-way street. I've stopped posting jobs to HN because, even though I explicitly state that I'm not looking for interns or remote candidates, I still get hundreds of e-mails asking if I will make an exception. The ones I reply to are often persistent, and even sometimes accuse me of some sort of "-ism" for rejecting them.


You're assuming a lot... they could also be trying to get their attention again. Why would you give up just because you didn't hear back? Persistence is good.


Shouldn't have bothered with a throwaway to demean people for wanting an answer to their email

Sure, ignore spam applications but do send a note to let them know they got it


What about Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and the other major members of the military industrial complex? Many companies get nearly all of their revenue from government contracts.

In any case, they’re getting money in exchange for services or goods rendered to the government. SpaceX can at least claim to have provided a very valuable service, for a very good price.

Compare with programs like the F-35, among many other crimes against the American tax payer.


So, I think it's pretty common to object to monopolies and crony capitalism with defense contractors too. The what-about-ism seems out of place when you're talking about something _people already constantly complain about_.


If every military contractor was as good as SpaceX there would be no problem. It’s not crony capitalism or a monopoly just because the government is your primary customer.

The military contractors (“defense contractor” is doublespeak like DoD) are actually bribing generals and congressmen while SpaceX competes on technology and price. They’re bringing the price down on space launches which is a major strategic goal of the US military. They’ve got some cool shit to put up there but a lot of it is not yet economically feasible even with their budgets.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: