Famously she descended, her red hair
Unbound and bronzed by sea-reflections, caught
Crinkled with sea-pearls. The fine slender taut
Knees that let down her feet upon the air,
Young breasts, slim flanks and golden quarries were
Odder than when the young distraught
Unknown Venetian, painting her portrait, thought
He'd not imagined what he painted there.
And I too commenced with that golden cloud:
Lipped her delicious hands and had my ease
Faring fantastically, perversely proud.
All loveliness demands our courtesies.
Since she was dead I praised her as I could
Silently, among the Barberini bees.
> What exactly would one gain from using schemas, if I can send the value (state) of any of my static types to another application using Transit?
Interoperability with other languages, for one. The static type you defined in your language can't be used with any other languages. Schemas are static types that can be used across languages.
Right, but you can write a decoder an let Transit convert your type to an equivalent type in another language.
That's the whole point of Transit, interoperability with other languages. Having a good set of scalar types, basic composite types, and the ability to extend it with your own semantic types built recursively from the base types.
