No wonder Europe is such a laggard in tech when even software devs write non sense like this.

One one hand they want independence from the evil US hyperscalers but on the other hand they are ready to kill any new company in the EU.

> (b) A business shall be in violation of this title if it fails to cure any alleged violation within 30 days after being notified of alleged noncompliance. Any business, service provider, or other person that violates this title shall be subject to an injunction and liable for a civil penalty of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) for each violation or seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) for each intentional violation, which shall be assessed and recovered in a civil action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General. The civil penalties provided for in this section shall be exclusively assessed and recovered in a civil action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General.

$7,500 per intentional violation, $2,500 per unintentional.

[1] https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm...

The CCPA applies to any business, including any for-profit entity that collects consumers' personal data, does business in California (regardless of where it is located), and satisfies at least one of the following thresholds:

Has annual gross revenues in excess of $25 million in its most recent tax year;[11] Buys, receives, or sells the personal information of 100,000 or more consumers or households; or Earns more than half of its annual revenue from selling consumers' personal information.[12][13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Consumer_Privacy_Ac...

> satisfies one or more of the following thresholds:

> (A) Has annual gross revenues in excess of twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000), as adjusted pursuant to paragraph (5) of subdivision (a) of Section 1798.185.

> (B) Alone or in combination, annually buys, receives for the business’s commercial purposes, sells, or shares for commercial purposes, alone or in combination, the personal information of 50,000 or more consumers, households, or devices.

> (C) Derives 50 percent or more of its annual revenues from selling consumers’ personal information.

This alone is enough to apply to most non-trivial apps/businesses where large-scale data harvesting is a huge problem:

> the personal information of 50,000 or more consumers, households, or devices.

I usually hear the “we [europe] have some of the brightest minds, we can do anything” and sure, granted, but that’s not the issue and it has never been. Why would those bright minds want to build something in a place that’s so obviously against the very same idea of free competition? Of course they don’t, those who can just flee and those who can’t usually end up building some useless grant-ware in an endless cycle. That’s not to say that we don’t have great startups and entrepreneurs, we do, but I find myself fighting every day against a system that’s built for the state to decide what, when and how citizens must innovate (and live).

/s

On what's a good 1on1 I wrote this https://www.paceflow.io/guides/topics/one-on-ones

Though it will be probably different from what you are going to see in big tech and their smaller copycats where they make 1on1 a glorified status update.

What's the current EBITDA?

Without seeing the books it’s hard to say but from this description there doesn’t appear to be any equity in the company at all.

Any calculations that use stuff like DCF are basically nonsense that ends up being negotions about the multipliers.

    #!/usr/bin/env bash
    OBJECT_NAME="pg_dump_$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ").dump.gz"
    pg_dump --dbname="${DB_CONNECTION}" | gzip > "${OBJECT_NAME}"
    rclone copy "./${OBJECT_NAME}" "cf:${CLOUDFLARE_NAMESPACE_ID}/db/"