Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tempay's commentslogin

As much as I'm a Python fan I strongly disagree here that rust is a red herring.

Having a static binary makes distribution way simplier. There are a bunch of ways you could try to achive something like in python but it would be significantly larger.

Performance-wise writing it in python would have heavy startup overhead and wouldn't be able to get close to the same level of performance.

Obviously you could achive the same thing in many other languages, but rust ends up being a really good fit for making a small static binary for this workload of network heavy, IO-bound, async/threading friendly with the occasional bit of CPU heavy work.


It’s been a lot longer than that. There was a reasonable sized effort to provide binaries via conda-forge but the users never came. That said, the PyPy devs were always a pleasure to work with.


> It’s been a lot longer than that.

pypy 7.3.20, officially supporting python 3.11, was released in july 2025: https://pypy.org/posts/2025/07/pypy-v7320-release.html

We're in March 2026. That's 9 months, which is exactly what GP stated.

> There was a reasonable sized effort to provide binaries via conda-forge but the users never came.

How is that in any way relevant to the maintenance status of pypy?


This is basically the premise of https://www.blacksmith.sh/ as far as I know, though without the need to host the hardware yourself and the potential complexity they comes with that.


I did have some MySQL servers racked for over a decade and I was afraid to restart the machines. And yes as new versions of MySQL came out I did have to compile them myself.

Similar lower specced machines that were closer to the public internet had boot disk failures, but I had a few of them, so it wasn’t an issue. Spinning metal and all.

One of the db servers dying would have required a next day colo visit… so I never rebooted.


It seems like 1Password is significantly more secure given the ratio of its market share to the number of articles I’ve seen like this one.


It requires root


Running eBPF programs doesn't strictly require root.


It requires cap_bpf which is considered a high privileged capability.

So yes, it requires root in the sense of what people mean by root.


You can also enable unpriviledged ebpf.


I’ve seen LLVM dependent builds hit well over 30GB. At that point it started breaking several package managers.


Prompt for a login or to check for updates on every start or once a week. It wouldn’t be difficult to get the numbers up for the number of online devices.


> Is Mozilla trying hard to kill itself?

I feel like this question has been valid for almost as long as I can remember (e.g. the Mr. Robot extension incident). I find myself struggling to tell if Mozilla is an inherently flawed company or if it's just inherent to trying to survive in such a space.


What does the LHC physics program have to do with military applications?


Research on interactions between particles can probably be helpful for nuclear weapons R&D.


You'd be surprised how creative the military can be when there's demand


Would expect with a message meet that criteria of exiting with a more helpful error message? From the postmortem it seems to me like they just didn’t know it even was panicing


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: