Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | totally's commentslogin

If only the AI could explain the errors that the AI outputs.


Cannot you stuff the snakes tail into its mouth?

I tried this for some very small decompilation projects, and it was cute at best.

Then I sent it a boot loader. I should have posted it on a ceral box for better results.

Is someone going to suggest that I check the dissembly into git hub and watch it make a tutorial?


What would be more sane? Allowing things to remain broken at night? Having someone who is not a software engineer fix it?


Either pay another full time night shift or yes, accept that things are broken for the time.

If your product is really so important that it can't be down, hire more engineers and pass the markup to your customers.

I'm glad I live in the country where you have to have 11 hours between end of work and start of work(except for special cases afaik).


There are legitimate reasons to pull in someone after hours, but it really has to be catastrophic. I'd 100% want to be called in if I deployed something knocking out 911 service for a whole state and I was the only one with the knowledge to actually fix it in a timely manner. However, most problems are not like that and are either able to be delayed until an actual business day or can be solved by someone else.


Let's be real, we're talking about line of business apps and ecommerce stores making $5,000/day total revenue. "Critical infrastructure" has an entirely different failure model.


If the product that breaks in the night is SO important for the company, well, why is not the company paying for dedicated people (not the engineers who create the product) to take care of it when it's broken? As said above, while on-call you don't write code, you just turn off feature flags, reboot machines, etc.

If the company cannot afford that, then the product is not that important and can remain broken until the morning.

Even 24h fast food places hire 3 people (each working 8h)!


If a 7-Eleven is open 24 hours a day, they usually hire three 8-hour shifts (roughly speaking).


If you want things to not break, have redundancy in hardware and failover modes that let you function in reduced capacity.

Manual fixes should never be done in a hurry, and if your system is that fragile, I really wonder about the competency of your senior employees and leadership.


Is symmetry between left and right brain what allows consciousness to exist?


Clearly not, since you can have consciousness with only half a brain. Even a full hemispherectomy doesn't make you not conscious. In fact, there may be little change to the personality or cognition at all.

The symmetry between right and left brain doesn't really correspond to the types of symmetries they're talking about in the article. They're usually expressed as "The laws of physics are independent of X; you can substitute X with Y and the laws work the same." There isn't any kind of substitution here, so no place to apply the symmetry.


Given that the left and right brain aren't exactly symmetrical and will receive and process different inputs that seems like a no.


If some experimentator will destroy a half of his brain in such a way to not harm anything else - does he have a chance to keep being consciouness? That experiment kind of answers the question.


https://www.uclahealth.org/medical-services/pediatric-neuros...

It's literally a medical procedure that children (or adults[1]) with extreme seizures or epilepsy undergo so that they can live more normal lives.

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7281896/


In my opinion, one is between "this needs to be remembered, I will need this later" and "I have already remembered this, immediately recover!".


What good is blame?


"We must take security seriously or we got sued out of existence" is good motivator for management.


Just limit lawsuit damage at the source, force arbitration, or collapse any plurality of suits into a slap-on-the-wrist class action!


If an FBI raid is confirmation of guessing right, then could we brute force all top secrets by making guesses and seeing who gets raided?


If things had been different it could have been called "Occam's Tweet"


They used to say "tell me a little bit about yourself." At least for a literal-minded developer the "little bit" added some guard rails against unnecessary verbosity.


Yes, it doesn't say why it wasn't.


Yeah!


C'mon, man. You're better than Torben.


I started reading and thinking that 50 is old, and then I realized that I'll be turning 41 soon enough. So, yeah.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: